when i play some games and have some inn units like elven warriors , they always told me "thats lame" also "Noobish move" , although the players that i play with r good and some of them play cw , when i play cw they get some inn units and they have no problem with that but when i play 1.06 most of them say its lame , so i want to know inn units is lame or Not?!
No its not lame. Its called knowing how to play the game.
P.S Some 1.06 players call anything lame when they are losing. Just ignore + pwn.
pretty much what deth said, they are fair, don't listen to complainers. They are actually needed more on clanwars, like peasants for elves where on 1.06 peasants are not as good.
Ignore the dumb asses! Get this one. I used Gondor Knights vs this one guy on a ladder match. He had Elves and then called me a cheater then DC the match. Who cheated?
In a bigger amount Elven Warriors and Wildmen ARE lame. In comparison to their low price their strength is too high. Especially Elven Warriors are nearly unbeatable, they're untrampable, can be equipped with ST Arrows and have an insane range. A Isengard X-Bow is way weaker although it costs the same. Means lame, if you only build them.
EA patch sucks. Maddox Patch rules! Don't see any balance issues with BTDC but with 1.06 it is full of bugs, lame units and cheats. Too bad that EA will never release the 1.07 patch that would have used part of Maddox patch. Cheat or use a bug on me I report you and use lame units I will just get something lamer.
This post has been edited by sub0ta1: Sep 19 2009, 17:50 PM
In a bigger amount Elven Warriors and Wildmen ARE lame. In comparison to their low price their strength is too high. Especially Elven Warriors are nearly unbeatable, they're untrampable, can be equipped with ST Arrows and have an insane range. A Isengard X-Bow is way weaker although it costs the same. Means lame, if you only build them.
i know this is 1.06 section but also in cw they use them , why is ther big diffrence between them i mean in 2.4 and 1.6 cuz i guesse no much diffrence between them in 2.4 and 1.6 ?
In a bigger amount Elven Warriors and Wildmen ARE lame. In comparison to their low price their strength is too high. Especially Elven Warriors are nearly unbeatable, they're untrampable, can be equipped with ST Arrows and have an insane range. A Isengard X-Bow is way weaker although it costs the same. Means lame, if you only build them.
They are lame because you let them spam them? It's your fault if you give them the economy to spam Inn Elves, and have you seen how slow building inn elves are? If they get 5 or 6 bats of them, it's your problem. Idk how you can call this lame, just because you get owned by it
i know this is 1.06 section but also in cw they use them , why is ther big diffrence between them i mean in 2.4 and 1.6 cuz i guesse no much diffrence between them in 2.4 and 1.6 ?
changes were made to make them more balanced like he said inn elves take more trample damage etc etc. They are not lame due to their large build time, and the fact that the building is fairly easy to capture or destroy. If you can't do that, you are probably losing anyway.
They are lame because you let them spam them? It's your fault if you give them the economy to spam Inn Elves, and have you seen how slow building inn elves are? If they get 5 or 6 bats of them, it's your problem. Idk how you can call this lame, just because you get owned by it
Stop arguing with the Dawg, you know he's right. It's the same pointless argument like the stupid Eagle one. "An Eagle costs 4600 overall what do you do with your money meanwhile?" This has not much to do with outplaying someone either.
They are lame because you let them spam them? It's your fault if you give them the economy to spam Inn Elves, and have you seen how slow building inn elves are? If they get 5 or 6 bats of them, it's your problem. Idk how you can call this lame, just because you get owned by it
Actually the construction time of inn elves is pritty fast, they hit that particular aspect with the nerf bat on BT because it contributed to them beeing so OP. Had they merely made them more vulnerable to cavalry they would probably still be OP there
The only real thing you can do against these units is simply destroying the inn. 1.06 even archers can do this in no time, and if your a faction that has little to no benefits from an inn and your facing motw, just take it down when you pass it before you are stuck fighting them off
They can be pritty lame, considering their cp cost of 40, their good production time and their relatively low cost for a tier 1,5 unit. A few tho are merely support, its when people mass them against factions like goblins, thats when they become lame. Cause its not hard to mass inn elves against goblins, you already have the stronger earlygame as motw
Yes, some 1.06 inn units are lame. Others are not.
Lame Inn U:
Elven Warriors. These units make motw gods. Impossible to stop as certain factions (mordor, gobs). These have recieved some nerfs and are now fairly balanced (annoying how well they survive trample still tho).
Wildmen. These units w/ fire are too strong, especially when garrisoning a tower. They have recieved some nerfs as well (and are still a bit too strong me thinks)
Questionable Inn Units:
Corsairs, mainly due to their low cost/high level when purchased and the fact that in 1.06 firebombs are stupidly op.
Not-Op in ANY sense:
Hobbits-they suck in 1.06, much better in btp.
Harad Lancers-they suck in 1.06, suck a little less in btp.
when i play some games and have some inn units like elven warriors , they always told me "thats lame" also "Noobish move" , although the players that i play with r good and some of them play cw , when i play cw they get some inn units and they have no problem with that but when i play 1.06 most of them say its lame , so i want to know inn units is lame or Not?!
Posts: 124
Game: