CNC Zero Hour

look at this replay and here are some screen shots to prove it my m8 and i were playing the {H-911} CLAN ,luckly enough my mate pro was good enough for a come back blue tend to bunker alot but when he shot that tech with jarmen in reds base mid game he moved it 2 times and blue beaconed it both times ,i know my mate is banned from here but mh is mh tbh.
thanks ~X~Beholder

	2vs2_h_911_mh.zip
	Size: 183.01k
	Size (unzipped): 49.42k
	Number of downloads: 37
	Player Name	Side	Team
	~X~The_Beholder{0}		2
	{H-911}urbacdor{0}		1
	P|2O_^N00B^		2
	{H-911}Blizzard		1

100% map hack for sure. Your complaining that they bunkered to much but what did u expect from 2v2 tox mirror.

yeah but blue was a noob tbh anyway

So,

{H-911}urbacdor{0} beaconed right on your stealthed Jarmen Kell several times prooving solid Maphack whatsoever and nothing denying it.

The other 911 guy force fired with his Scorpian Tank RIGHT on the Jarmen kell undetected. He did this not right on blue's beacon, but right on the Jarmen Kell itself. Luckily, this is enough evidence as well, but barely.

Official Verdict:

Both {H-911} members involved in this replay are both 100% Maphack.

Have a nice day!

This post has been edited by DeuX: Mar 27 2006, 22:43 PM

{H-911}urbacdor{0} = 100% maphack. If you notice, before the jarmen incident, he also beacons greens tunnel which is under fog. Whats so odd is that he fails pick up workers crossing into his m8's base and on the other side of the bridge.

............But i dont think you should convict his m8, he didnt seem to pick anything and only go jarmen on beaconing. If he his convicted it is unfairly.....he shouldnt have done that but he doesnt mh.

But see, it all adds up though because he fired RIGHT on the Jarmen Kell. Did his m8 tell him there's a Jarmen Kell there? Well if he didn't have maphack, then why would he force fire at the beacon? If he had maphack, then obviously he would fire RIGHT on the Jarmen Kell. Also consider the fact that in that replay he doesn't really give a wooden nickel that his ally obviously maphacks. He just insists and doesn't care, then just fires at the Jarmen Kell. Things like this can't instantly convict someone, but it surely adds up if other suspicious things happen involved with the replay and the people there, as Tony Blair said in my sig.

To let you know, I'm being honest here and I can proove that because this guy is AKA a friend of mine that's not anymore.

If it's necessary, I'll scrutinize his moves and try to find a solid proof.

This post has been edited by DeuX: Mar 26 2006, 20:43 PM

I bet that's you lmao

lets check the uid anyone ?

i have some replays of him

By the way, blizzard is A.K.A. [N.R]Convict who is known by most people.

lol now he is aka =BulletStrike

i dont believe it is lord of war extinguisher.I have played with him on quite a few occasions and never once suspected him of mh.He is a good player.I definetly dont have him with that acc either

..................................

This post has been edited by *Lord~Of~War*: Mar 31 2006, 18:19 PM

Ill take that bet. Say $1million? I have played with convict and he doesnt mh, maybe his m8 did, but gettin jarmen was luck. Glad to have clarified that one. ExTiNgUiShEr cant u stop flaming, can someone in admin just ban this guy, i thought the pinned topic said no flaming or ur banned? Arent you gonna put that into action? Or is he allowed to just be an asshole to everyone?

This post has been edited by *Lord~Of~War*: Mar 31 2006, 18:18 PM

To be honest, extinguisher didn't really flame; he just made a bet that you were A.K.A. Convict. Now, what really is flaming is what you said in the last sentence about him.

Anyway, as I said, why would Blizzard fire at the beacon and couldn't care less about why his m8 beaconed there?

If I see more flaming, I'll report for a ban.

Case reopened.

It seems I've been given an explanation of how and why this guy force fired at the beacon. As to now that I have more experience in maphack cases, I now know that this innocent person shouldn't be convicted at all. Big apologies to you, man.

The verdict should be,



Again, I'm extremely sorry about ruining your reputation during after my false verdict.

I will remove your name from the maphack list, but your ally is still for sure an 100% maphacker.

Case closed.

Umm...?

Oh, right.

Blizzard said Urbacador beaconed a lot of times at the Jarmen Kell to tell him to force fire at the beacon. If you watch the replay, red force fired on blue's beacon. It's obvious that Blue maphacks, but Red can't be convicted because of the reason of his maphack friend to force fire there.