DeuX, how could you explain that RepInfo and the replay upload tool on this page here both show ChinaVan as the chosen army and not random like the player has chosen it (what can be proven by the basis of the screenshot) ?
Is there a known bug or something like that causing problems like this from time to time ? Since there is no bug there are obviously hacks in the case.
Or is there something for you, DeuX, that speaks in Bladi's favour ?
Tbh, I once hosted a 2v2, and when the game started, one of the other people got changed to Boss Gen. I was then told that only the host could technically change the armies, and I am 100% sure I wasn't running any hacks...so either anyone can armyhack, or it was a bug...
Tbh, I once hosted a 2v2, and when the game started, one of the other people got changed to Boss Gen. I was then told that only the host could technically change the armies, and I am 100% sure I wasn't running any hacks...so either anyone can armyhack, or it was a bug...
Mmm, that's okay. The explanation I was given was that only the host can actually change armies, because he's th ehost....and some other server and hosting crap...thanks for clearing it up
i dunno, i personally think the rules shud b changed regarding conviction of army hackers.
if there is sufficient evidence against you, whether it is in the form of reps and ss, from a LARGE variety of reliable people i personally think that they should b convicted
atm the only way of convicting some 1 is gamecam and if u have been changed to boss gen or civilian, which aint gona happen atm tehre are too many people getting away with it and no physical way to stop them, becuase there is always a lack of evidence. if there is any other way plz let us no
extreme
This post has been edited by ExTrEmE: May 28 2006, 18:51 PM
A player is to only be convicted by 100% proof and that is why there's the conviction called [100% Armyhack], unless we can also make verdicts like [99.9999999% Armyhack] and such such for these kinds of evidences.
As to this evidence, it only shows one screenshot showing both players are random, but not starting. It's possible that the replay posted with this screenshot is not the correct one, which is why it can't be prooven only with this evidence here. If this can convict people, then there's the huge possiblility that innocent people will be convicted due to this matter.
This post has been edited by DeuX: May 30 2006, 19:23 PM
we played 1v1 cw and we both pick random and i got chinaV, ok no problem i will make wf+airfield
but it was strange coz he take along time to start the game after i accept...so i make screenshot that shwo that both take random
but replayinfo 1.7 said i pick chinaV
Posts: 640
Clan: -MaD|
Game: