Command and Conquer 3

Tiberium Wars Best Replays of the Year 2011

Reply to this topic Start new topic
# 21Cloverfield Apr 24 2012, 19:42 PM
stateoftheunion ....does that nick is anywhere in the top 10? or ever rreach top3 in some tournament? or ever achieved anything?

i got expert badge i got much more knowledge than u about c&c

Posts: 4,703

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 22Sh0ckTr34tment Apr 24 2012, 19:49 PM
The simple answer is that no, he hasn't. Its just a simple fact, if good TW players go over to KW within a couple of weeks they are already competing with the best players in KW. When KW players come over to TW to try and compete with TW guys, they just get bashed. Hard.

Posts: 3,193

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 23kimosabe Apr 25 2012, 03:34 AM
QUOTE(Stopbitchin @ Apr 22 2012, 21:52 PM) *

would've expected to see our game on tower, but GJ anyways! thumb.gif


The game was played on 30th December 2010. Just missed out for the 2010 best replays. THough was a really good game. Only a few days out of 2011 + had more wubs then some of the other 2011 replays. I may put it in if I have time.

QUOTE(Fatuscrilius @ Apr 23 2012, 08:00 AM) *

Great vid by Kimo, makes Cnc looks so awesome when its in a good edited video

Thanks dude. wub.gif

QUOTE(Detnaw @ Apr 23 2012, 21:31 PM) *

yes great summary video was really fun to watch smile.gif
how long have you needed to make it? looks like alot of work perfect effects with the sound...


Thanks, yeah it took awhile, probably about 3-4 full days all up.

QUOTE(stateoftheunion @ Apr 24 2012, 03:30 AM) *

this is tw rep ot the year? biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

lol in kw there are like 50 of those.....

lol, yeah & your in all of them right??

QUOTE(stateoftheunion @ Apr 24 2012, 07:11 AM) *

seriously, your "game of the year" is not an intense match at all
i just need to watch one of green zeros vods: any of those replays is better than your best.

kw>>>>tw

in kw games there is

1. more action
2. faster action
3. more micro
4. more tactics
5. more map awareness necesarry


oh noes.

Posts: 3,063

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 24Cloverfield Apr 25 2012, 09:46 AM
kimo that was u talking?

Posts: 4,703

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 25Luvaskot Apr 25 2012, 10:37 AM
QUOTE(stateoftheunion @ Apr 23 2012, 21:11 PM) *

seriously, your "game of the year" is not an intense match at all
i just need to watch one of green zeros vods: any of those replays is better than your best.

kw>>>>tw

in kw games there is

1. more action
2. faster action
3. more micro
4. more tactics
5. more map awareness necesarry



QUOTE(stateoftheunion @ Apr 24 2012, 16:15 PM) *

actually its only YOUR comments that are "glibberish"

how can you know at which level i play?

does it proof your statements right, that you have an expert badge?

what you just dont get is that faster economy doesnt mean more micro or more action-is this deduction was right, it would mean that unlimited money games would be the most micro intense and challanging

and now go on with your no content-only polemics comments.



laughing my fat ass off. Man are you a joke biggrin.gif

Posts: 284

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 26Fatuscrilius Apr 25 2012, 11:53 AM
Everyone aprat from State of the Union is laughing at the statements hes made on this forum, that being said roflcopterbbqftw at Kw having quicker Eco and them more More actions/Micro/Mapawareness, if anything their both about the same in skill though I notice Kw players having real problems with Tw and not the other way around look at Kimo, Bike and Shock them be tearing shit up.

Posts: 1,289

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 27Sh0ckTr34tment Apr 25 2012, 13:30 PM
Tib Wars players have higher APM than KW players. This is a fact. Check an average "good" player game in KW and you will see an apm of roughly 60-70. "Good" player games in TW are usually hitting 80 at the bare minimum and are more often around 100+. If KW was so micro intensive and TW was not, then this would be the other way around. The reason it is this way round is because rather simply, in TW you have to do more shit and do it faster to win.

Posts: 3,193

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 28HiDrauLiCk`o Apr 25 2012, 21:32 PM
|_-CiNeMoSaBe-_| still works.Awesome.Good music on the video indeed

Posts: 1,612

Clan: Exceptionally Skilled

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 29Sh0ckTr34tment Apr 25 2012, 22:08 PM
Oh yes, and I must add - great job with the video kimo - was rather sexy.

Posts: 3,193

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 30JCDoo7 Apr 26 2012, 04:25 AM
QUOTE(HiDrauLiCk`o @ Apr 26 2012, 01:32 AM) *

|_-CiNeMoSaBe-_| still works.Awesome.Good music on the video indeed




Hahaha, nice one biggrin.gif

Posts: 7,396

Clan: PimpTaxi

Game: None

+
# 31eXs.bLoOd Apr 26 2012, 12:24 PM
QUOTE(stateoftheunion @ Apr 24 2012, 11:31 AM) *

economy is low like shit?
in tw it always takes like 5 minutes unit the first real agression: first build like 6 reffs....
in kw the first agression usually come right after the first warfactory-or even earlier
kw requires more micro, cauase you really have to avoid loosing your harvesters-and thats why scouting is much more important: if 4 orcas come in in tw to kill your harvs-who cares, you have got another 15-kw instead really punishes those mistakes, which means you really have to watch out for your units
you are completly mistaken if you think that the sheer amount of units makes this game more micro intense-why moving your units to defend flanks, if you can have them sit around at any?
and indeed there are way more tactics.


+1 and full agree

Nobody can play an spam like tw in kw games.
U need much more micro to hold ur mapcontrol in kw like in tw.

tw got an bigger eco but if u lose on kw the half of ur harvs u lost for 70%.

Posts: 415

Clan: Exceptionally Skilled

Game: Tiberium Alliances

+
# 32stateoftheunion Apr 27 2012, 18:30 PM
QUOTE(Cloverfield @ Apr 24 2012, 19:42 PM) *

stateoftheunion ....does that nick is anywhere in the top 10? or ever rreach top3 in some tournament? or ever achieved anything?

i got expert badge i got much more knowledge than u about c&c

And again you come up with your expert badge-and still having it means that all your statements are right, but stupid you apparently doesnt get this.

QUOTE(kimosabe @ Apr 25 2012, 03:34 AM) *

lol, yeah & your in all of them right??
oh noes.

1.I never claimed that im a pro player-but why should this matter? Would I automaticly be right if I had an expert badge?
2."oh noes"-why?

QUOTE(zeh1r @ Apr 25 2012, 10:37 AM) *

laughing my fat ass off. Man are you a joke biggrin.gif

Nothing to say about that, troll.

QUOTE(Fatuscrilius @ Apr 25 2012, 11:53 AM) *

Everyone aprat from State of the Union is laughing at the statements hes made on this forum, that being said roflcopterbbqftw at Kw having quicker Eco and them more More actions/Micro/Mapawareness, if anything their both about the same in skill though I notice Kw players having real problems with Tw and not the other way around look at Kimo, Bike and Shock them be tearing shit up.

So which KW player has problems with TW? This is just a claim and has besides nothing to do with the things I wrote.
I dont think that Shock tear me up, the games i played versus him were in fact a bit in my favour, if I remeber right (not meant to be offensive or flame, as you havent played kw a lot).
And its 100% clear that bike will rape me anytime, as he says he has played about 30000 games compared to my 2500-i dont think i ever won against him.

The only resonse to my arguments comes from Shock with his latest post, the rest of you is just a bunch of flamers, trashtalkers and douchebags.

Posts: 1,125

Game: Kanes Wrath

+
# 33kimosabe Apr 27 2012, 21:22 PM
Says you - The guy shouting outrageous claims deliberately derailing the topic + acting all superior & having the need to boast to everyone, in how KW requires uber heightened skills. When in fact, you have no factual knowledge about TW whatsoever.

Posts: 3,063

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 34Cloverfield Apr 27 2012, 22:54 PM
why in generals2 or sc2 they ban noobs when they post crap and we cant do this here with this noob clueless?

Posts: 4,703

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 35Cloverfield Apr 27 2012, 23:10 PM
QUOTE(stateoftheunion @ Apr 27 2012, 20:30 PM) *


So which KW player has problems with TW?


bloodsport, unleashed the so called pro, jonycalcinha, dirty dutch , loa5000 , ipownyou , ....

Posts: 4,703

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 36Sh0ckTr34tment Apr 27 2012, 23:59 PM
Pretty much every KW player apart from Eclipse has trouble with TW, but even he doesn't get winning records vs players like Maze or Bike.

Posts: 3,193

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 37worldsdominate Apr 28 2012, 17:41 PM
All the "good" players from kw couldn't even beat me on tw and gave me no fight at all. But as soon as I go play in kw for the first time in years, I gave them the fight for their money

Posts: 513

Game: Generals 2

+
# 38JcGNeon May 6 2012, 16:54 PM
That's 'cause most KW players aren't good at KW, let alone TW.

Blood and Eclipse are the only players I would consider good that have played this.

Posts: 990

Game: League of Legends

+
# 39kimosabe May 8 2012, 15:02 PM
The only thing Blood is good @ is being arrogant.

This post has been edited by kimosabe: May 8 2012, 17:31 PM

Posts: 3,063

Game: Command and Conquer 3

+
# 40Tomber May 8 2012, 23:40 PM
lol

Posts: 6,723

Game: None

+

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)