CNC Zero Hour

xfrost,

the Mao got only ONCE the Order to destroy the Dozer. After that the MAO follow automaticly the DOZER - no matter if the FOW is there or NOT. The Mao will follow his Target. Only ONE Order you need for THIS attack. The mao was only once selected by Slayer.

Greetz

I had a quick look but im busy and hevent got time to go through ti properly now, it close, depends on site range of teh truck and fog regeneration etc. Ill change the title for now and im sure tony will give this a look and will give u a good conclusion.

Tank u very much, ^General .

xFROST, u r the so ridiculous....

U want to be a ReplayReviewer???lol

The mao was commanded 1 time, as he came out of the waff.At this situation, the Supply Truck could see the Dozer.
Just test how far a Sup truck can scout, n00b.

And u should know the combination: strg+alt+shift+t as a ReplayReviewer

Let other Player do the Job as a ReplayReviewer, u r to unexperienced in this case.
My opinion about that....

And of course 100% NO Maphack.

Thanks xFROST for looking and evaluating this replay, you obviously took time to take your screenshots and writing up on them


Its not a lock on under fog though, the truck would have enabled him to target the dozer the first time, and the second time was most probably just the fact that he selected the BM again, not another order.

So its quite an easy one for me

Verdict:

No Maphack

Mr.Blair, this "THANK YOU FOR SHOWING ALL THE TRUTH"
comes strictly from the bottom of my heart

Guys can u please lay off frost now, hes a replay reviewer, not a maphack reviewer. Hes also not perfect, he got it wrong but he was still allowed to accuse, and he went about it mostly the right way. He made ss and attempted to prove it, although i dont think he should have changed the title himself. Im an SRR and i suck at maphack reviews but it doesnt mean i cant reivew replays.

If he wants to apolagise thats up to him, but yes, he got it wrong and im saying sorry for that the title said 100% mh when it wasnt.

I would like to apologize to slayer i was wrong

I hope i have not caused you to much inconvenience


xFROST

chill out guys, he was stating what he thought

doesnt need 2 be flamed like this

btw tony that was out, u play zh tony?

Sometimes :whiste: *Looks at X-Fire stats*


LOL


BTW: What do you mean with "out"?



This post has been edited by ToNy-BLaiR: May 5 2005, 20:21 PM

outa order

You mean the flaming was out of order? Well, yeah I guess it was. Afterall, he saw a BM lock onto a dozer from miles away, and then appeared to be given another order to attack, simple mistake.

Ok, I apologise for all the flames - sorry, xFROST,
but I was really gettin´ mad to read, I used maphack.

I´m moderator at www.united-forum.de - one of
germanys biggest cnc-board. I stand 4 fairplay all
the time - even when I lost many games. But I don´t
care about winning or losing like the true cw-soldiers.

Anyways, hope we can be friendly for the future .

Slayer


thank you but i feel i am the one that should say sorry you had the right to defened your self as anyone else would i made a mistake and for that i am sorry

Good Gamein have fun

xFROST

I think thats the end of this topic now, both parties have apologised and thats what I like to see, all happy again