I just have to laugh at some of these comments. You have the Wehr fanboys who not only play the most overpowered faction in the game but they try and tell Brit players they can't do anything that may counter their Gren Spam. To top that off they're all balance experts but don't actually play Brits. Keep it up guys, it's a laugh a minute.
Think of it like this: The Wehr is a unstoppable force in the hands of a good player; CW is troublesome even in the hands of a newbie.
My beef with Brits is not exactly the units, but the amount of multitasking/skill need to play.While I am burning my neurons microing my Wolks, ajusting my mg arc of fire, leting my sniper take a shot and move, you are just charging in and focus-firing.And that,the amount of brain need to play, makes them easy - and I can say that because every time I get CW in random games, it's a almost effortless win.
Of course, fighting them is much easier and therefore balanced when you use some equaly brainless tactic,like the grem spam.But I can never make that work
This post has been edited by tkemberli: Aug 2 2014, 10:52 AM
Can someone tell me where does this brit is op comments are coming from? I mean, I see just as many games of people losing with brits than winning. It seems like the hate comes from the fact that the british has everything they need to counter axis players. 2 cromwells and a ff are a boss.
What I'm trying understand is, how can axis players spam or blob but if a brit player does it, they're noobs. 3 staghounds and their spammers but if an axis player has 3 pumas, nothing is said. The argument about blobs has already been addressed but even then, everyone just shrugs it off. Stags are good at killing infantry, so are pumas. So when a puma is on the field, normally, you would go for a tank to keep it in check. If your opponent is "stag spamming" why not go for a tank? I've yet to see a game where stags were owning a tank.
I mean, you have the best tanks in the game, you have fantastic anti tank units at your disposal. I feel as though no matter what the brits do, it's op. You have people losing games to brits but instead of saying gg or accepting the fact that they played better, you blame it on their faction. So is the reason people hate brits because they lose to it or is there something i'm missing?
Can someone tell me where does this brit is op comments are coming from? I mean, I see just as many games of people losing with brits than winning. It seems like the hate comes from the fact that the british has everything they need to counter axis players. 2 cromwells and a ff are a boss.
What I'm trying understand is, how can axis players spam or blob but if a brit player does it, they're noobs. 3 staghounds and their spammers but if an axis player has 3 pumas, nothing is said. The argument about blobs has already been addressed but even then, everyone just shrugs it off. Stags are good at killing infantry, so are pumas. So when a puma is on the field, normally, you would go for a tank to keep it in check. If your opponent is "stag spamming" why not go for a tank? I've yet to see a game where stags were owning a tank.
I mean, you have the best tanks in the game, you have fantastic anti tank units at your disposal. I feel as though no matter what the brits do, it's op. You have people losing games to brits but instead of saying gg or accepting the fact that they played better, you blame it on their faction. So is the reason people hate brits because they lose to it or is there something i'm missing?
You ain't missing nothing, the funny fact is that you stated what's actually going on for a long time here.
I posted this replay because people on my stream wanted me to. It wasn't a good game sure, but no brit games are good games.