In 2009, I won against the best brit player on St Mère Dumont. He almost killed me with his first squad of commandos, but I managed to get back with a fast puma, a stuh, etc. He had a 40 streak!
Versus brits, you need:
2 pioneers start > 1 schimmwagen > 3 volks > 1 mg > one sniper You attack the lieutenant right from the start with the schimmwagen. It is very annoying for them. Brits are weak in the beginning. It is good to be agressive.
Then, you need a diversified army: at gun, assault squads, t3 tank, puma, stuka, blitz tanks...
A mortar can also be helpful.
It is not efficient to make more than 2 pios in early game against good brit players.
In 2009, I won against the best brit player on St Mère Dumont. He almost killed me with his first squad of commandos, but I managed to get back with a fast puma, a stuh, etc. He had a 40 streak!
Versus brits, you need:
2 pioneers start > 1 schimmwagen > 3 volks > 1 mg > one sniper You attack the lieutenant right from the start with the schimmwagen. It is very annoying for them. Brits are weak in the beginning. It is good to be agressive.
Then, you need a diversified army: at gun, assault squads, t3 tank, puma, stuka, blitz tanks...
A mortar can also be helpful.
It is not efficient to make more than 2 pios in early game against good brit players.
i would say not enough shrecks. I saw only one shreck grenadier i think. Then Paks would not get overrun by crommwell. Better dont waste Ressource for support vet and get the shreck grens! Support vet is not bad but then the early game has to be much better.
i would say not enough shrecks. I saw only one shreck grenadier i think. Then Paks would not get overrun by crommwell. Better dont waste Ressource for support vet and get the shreck grens! Support vet is not bad but then the early game has to be much better.
I whanted finish game faster, later 88 instead of stuh and 1 more gren + shreks + medic bunker for reinf + vet2 would be better ofc and place safer paks, ofc I could won it like 90% or maybe even 100% if I would play defanse and slower style, but I get borred play this way, thats why fast vet2 for presure non stop from start
In 2009, I won against the best brit player on St Mère Dumont. He almost killed me with his first squad of commandos, but I managed to get back with a fast puma, a stuh, etc. He had a 40 streak!
Versus brits, you need:
2 pioneers start > 1 schimmwagen > 3 volks > 1 mg > one sniper You attack the lieutenant right from the start with the schimmwagen. It is very annoying for them. Brits are weak in the beginning. It is good to be agressive.
Then, you need a diversified army: at gun, assault squads, t3 tank, puma, stuka, blitz tanks...
A mortar can also be helpful.
It is not efficient to make more than 2 pios in early game against good brit players.
¨ hahahahaaha you are funny
What is funny? There is still the replay on gr.org... Wher is weak against us, but not against brits.
I don't deny the fact that LuckyStilet is presently the best wehr player. But in the past, top wehr players were often using a 2 pios start against brit players; not more.
This post has been edited by Ujira: Dec 5 2016, 08:43 AM
In 2009, I won against the best brit player on St Mère Dumont. He almost killed me with his first squad of commandos, but I managed to get back with a fast puma, a stuh, etc. He had a 40 streak!
Versus brits, you need:
2 pioneers start > 1 schimmwagen > 3 volks > 1 mg > one sniper You attack the lieutenant right from the start with the schimmwagen. It is very annoying for them. Brits are weak in the beginning. It is good to be agressive.
Then, you need a diversified army: at gun, assault squads, t3 tank, puma, stuka, blitz tanks...
A mortar can also be helpful.
It is not efficient to make more than 2 pios in early game against good brit players.
¨ hahahahaaha you are funny
What is funny? There is still the replay on gr.org... Wher is weak against us, but not against brits.
I don't deny the fact that LuckyStilet is presently the best wehr player. But in the past, top wehr players were often using a 2 pios start against brit players; not more.
dud balance in coh depands of level of both players. with same skills and after same number of games as USA and WM = USA level will be higher almost always. but on highest level wm stronger
This post has been edited by LuckyStilet: Dec 5 2016, 11:12 AM
I see what you mean. Wehr requires a lot of skill. Rifles are very good units with BARs... And there are 6 men in one rifle squad, but only five in volks and four in pg squads. Thus, US snipers are 17% to 34% more efficient than wehr snipers, and US has strong artillery (infantry company/calliope) or ultra cheap mortars (airborne).
Many US players don't use enough snipers and mortars.
I see what you mean. Wehr requires a lot of skill. Rifles are very good units with BARs... And there are 6 men in one rifle squad, but only five in volks and four in pg squads. Thus, US snipers are 17% to 34% more efficient than wehr snipers, and US has strong artillery (infantry company/calliope) or ultra cheap mortars (airborne).
Many US players don't use enough snipers and mortars.
yea it is like if both players missing nade (low skill), wm squads are smaller and they in smaller area so nade hit all squad,mostlikely squads survive and casualty price not that important on that level, but after few fights USA inf up in vet level and vet1 level give 25% accuracy and 20% taken accuracy. I am nut sure in numbers but if look how goes fight between rifles and volk - they like 50% missing so effective damage is like 50% and +25% is like +50% atack and +50% health... after that vet2 vet3 terminators... on high level players just avoid nade and wm makes own vet and things goes better for wm. stuff like that in all kind of fights
This post has been edited by LuckyStilet: Dec 5 2016, 10:42 AM
O_, .....
