Kento the first KCH hits the field after 35 minutes. By then you had 2 25p and 2 priests + got 4-5 free inf sections from you medic tent, despite it was destroyed several times.
If KCH is a problem by then, you're doing it wrong.
Besides they're still 360mp each and 700 mp/150 fuel for vet 3. Not even including teching and building t4 or the price of Kampfkraft Center itself.
It seems silly and unnecessary to suddenly say KCHs are OP. They're good, but at that cost they better be worth it.
I have vet 3 rifles more often than vet 3 KCH, so maybe you think vet 3 rifles are broken as well since its so easy to get them and they only cost 270mp? I hope you see the logic and irony. KCHs are a huge investment that doesnt always pay off. More often US player just get a bunch of vet within 10 minutes.
To actually complain on KCH being OP while playing mixed allies with same partner 99% of times (in random) is just sad. Just say gg and continue with your brit adventures of stupidity.
To actually complain on KCH being OP while playing mixed allies with same partner 99% of times (in random) is just sad. Just say gg and continue with your brit adventures of stupidity.
What the hell does it have to do whoever I play with with balance discussion. This is just such a stupid argument. Like why do you even care about who someone plays with. Just the fact that you make "barcounting" look like a hack?
I play with him in random 2v2 because the matching system wants so, I'm not wasting a second of my life stopping a game from happening, I lack the patience and the will. Specially when there are many games where both of the guys who I play against just leave from the first second and all I want to do is play, not just get easy wins.
This game posted here was tough, but was fun and intense, that's basically what I want when I join the queue. Of course we know matchmaking has predilection on getting us together and we take advantage of it, but who the fuck are you to complain.
To actually complain on KCH being OP while playing mixed allies with same partner 99% of times (in random) is just sad. Just say gg and continue with your brit adventures of stupidity.
What the hell does it have to do whoever I play with with balance discussion. This is just such a stupid argument. Like why do you even care about who someone plays with. Just the fact that you make "barcounting" look like a hack?
I play with him in random 2v2 because the matching system wants so, I'm not wasting a second of my life stopping a game from happening, I lack the patience and the will. Specially when there are many games where both of the guys who I play against just leave from the first second and all I want to do is play, not just get easy wins.
This game posted here was tough, but was fun and intense, that's basically what I want when I join the queue. Of course we know matchmaking has predilection on getting us together and we take advantage of it, but who the fuck are you to complain.
I already said GG at the end of the game.
You really should play some axis before you start crying about KCH being OP. That has all to do with the balance discussion. But I don't expect you to understand that.
To actually complain on KCH being OP while playing mixed allies with same partner 99% of times (in random) is just sad. Just say gg and continue with your brit adventures of stupidity.
What the hell does it have to do whoever I play with with balance discussion. This is just such a stupid argument. Like why do you even care about who someone plays with. Just the fact that you make "barcounting" look like a hack?
I play with him in random 2v2 because the matching system wants so, I'm not wasting a second of my life stopping a game from happening, I lack the patience and the will. Specially when there are many games where both of the guys who I play against just leave from the first second and all I want to do is play, not just get easy wins.
This game posted here was tough, but was fun and intense, that's basically what I want when I join the queue. Of course we know matchmaking has predilection on getting us together and we take advantage of it, but who the fuck are you to complain.
I already said GG at the end of the game.
thanks that u say here that u barcount i did a screenshot and send it to relic to report u
in the time of the fairplay forum for barcounting u get banned i hope they do now the same greetz nekron
To actually complain on KCH being OP while playing mixed allies with same partner 99% of times (in random) is just sad. Just say gg and continue with your brit adventures of stupidity.
What the hell does it have to do whoever I play with with balance discussion. This is just such a stupid argument. Like why do you even care about who someone plays with. Just the fact that you make "barcounting" look like a hack?
I play with him in random 2v2 because the matching system wants so, I'm not wasting a second of my life stopping a game from happening, I lack the patience and the will. Specially when there are many games where both of the guys who I play against just leave from the first second and all I want to do is play, not just get easy wins.
This game posted here was tough, but was fun and intense, that's basically what I want when I join the queue. Of course we know matchmaking has predilection on getting us together and we take advantage of it, but who the fuck are you to complain.
I already said GG at the end of the game.
thanks that u say here that u barcount i did a screenshot and send it to relic to report u
in the time of the fairplay forum for barcounting u get banned i hope they do now the same greetz nekron
Did I? You better edit the sreenshot then, otherwise the only thing you will get will be some people laughing at you. Looks like you can't understand english propperly.
By then you had 2 25p and 2 priests + got 4-5 free inf sections from you medic tent, despite it was destroyed several times.
If KCH is a problem by then, you're doing it wrong.
Besides they're still 360mp each and 700 mp/150 fuel for vet 3. Not even including teching and building t4 or the price of Kampfkraft Center itself.
It seems silly and unnecessary to suddenly say KCHs are OP. They're good, but at that cost they better be worth it.
I have vet 3 rifles more often than vet 3 KCH, so maybe you think vet 3 rifles are broken as well since its so easy to get them and they only cost 270mp?
I hope you see the logic and irony. KCHs are a huge investment that doesnt always pay off. More often US player just get a bunch of vet within 10 minutes.
agree!