@ice heh on the contrary, most of the time you encourage everyone to play on diff map which is why you seem to care so the way you keep doing that is like showing that your standards are based mostly on the dif environment where strategies and tactics are made and not on those strategies or tactices themselves which is more significant imo.
amazing game, whatched it!! congrats to both players for this great game...
i just mentioned 2 things:
cam: rly well played, but maybe get the eagle from ur fort! to harrass his tunnels.. would have been much easier to get controll ober the map for u then.. otto didnt have any archers and not rly 2 bats spiderriders...think it would help a lot what u think?
otto: maybe earlier upgrade of ur first fort would have dsaved it i guess.. same for u to get the dragon vs cava... easier to deff ur rbs adn ur armys..
otto stop trying to guess how I feel omg cuz you're wrong
I want diff map, but I don't care if you won't change b/c of me and my boredom with fords. I want you guys to play new maps because you want to or learn to want to, ie I want people to have more map variation for their sake...sadly this will prob never happen everyone so happy with fords ... except me, the guy who needs to watch good replays and write reviews!
I won't be active the following days anyways..imho try focus on the variety of strategies and the gamestyle of the players takin part in the games you want to review, not on the map..cheers
Was nice game. I was suprised who won in the end. Something I noticed Otto: You should had used poisons on spiderlings. Only cost 100 Cam: You didnt use your first 10pp until really late game
Was nice game. I was suprised who won in the end. Something I noticed Otto: You should had used poisons on spiderlings. Only cost 100 Cam: You didnt use your first 10pp until really late game
Anyways gg
thanks mate but this was purposely done so otto didn't know my PP path.
heh on the contrary, most of the time you encourage everyone to play on diff map which is why you seem to care
so the way you keep doing that is like showing that your standards are based mostly on the dif environment where strategies and tactics are made and not on those strategies or tactices themselves which is more significant imo.
@cam
i think you know which one was it