Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth

[R] legalostheswift vs RaNdoM|RuSH

#11DunedainStriker  Aug 26 2006, 15:13 PM -
UK|Rider(Isengard) vs. RaNdoM|RuSH(Gondor)
Map: Rohan


UK|Rider(Isengard)

Start BO: Uruk pit, Furnace, Mill

PP Progression: War Chant > Palantir > TL > Rain > Balrog

General Strategy: Uruks > XBows > Pikes > Lurtz > Upgrades > Saruman > Wargs > Ballistas > Battering Rams

Creeps: 2/6

Pros:
smile.gif extra laborers
smile.gif fast, fast pikes
smile.gif good formation use
smile.gif nice wormtongue power use


Cons:
sad.gif left your Outpost unguarded (it was destroyed)
sad.gif left warg pit in unused
sad.gif sent Saruman in too close and on low health (he was killed by Faramir's Wounding Arrow)
sad.gif lest ballistas exposed a little


A nice game on your part. You had very fast pikes to counter his Knights, and this made it very difficult for him to harass your economy, allowing you to gain MC. Once you had MC he put up a pretty good fight, but you won in the end. Try to guard your outposts a little better in the future. Also, if your are not using a unit production building, knock it down and put in a resource collecting building. Never send heroes into battle with low health, especially if your opponent has heroes around. Try putting a line of FU pikes in front of your ballistas to guard them from Knights. Wasted alot of time near the end (I'm not sure if this is related to trying to prevent him from cheating or what), but a good performance on your part.

UK|Rider Overall Score: 5.5/10



RaNdoM|RuSH(Gondor)

Start BO: Farm, Pippin, Farm, Farm, Farm

PP Progression: EW > Heal > Elves > Eagles > GTW > Rohirrim

General Strategy: Pippin > Knights > Faramir > Combos > Upgrades > Soldiers > Rangers > Trebs > Gandalf

Creeps: 4/6

Pros:
smile.gif nice creeping 4/6
smile.gif spread out fast early to take 3 farms out side your base (left him with only 1 mill for awhile)
smile.gif generally good formation use
smile.gif pretty good Knight micro early-mid game
smile.gif good harassment early-mid game
smile.gif good unit counters (soldiers>pikes)
smile.gif used Eagles to kill Lurtz
smile.gif good ballista kills w/ Knights


Cons:
sad.gif didn't get 6 BS (made upgrades more expensive)
sad.gif bad Knight micro later in the game (it seemed as if you were not paying attention to them)
sad.gif bad hero micro hurt you late game


On the whole, you had a pretty good game. You had a good start and had strong harassment early-mid game. In the end, his pikes kept you from harassing him more, giving him a stable economy, allowing him to take MC, and then to finish you off. Try to always get 6 BS for full discounts on upgrades (you should have replaced your inbase farm with a BS). If your order your Knights to go into an enemy held territory, try to keep a better eye on them, even not watching them for 2 seconds can put them in grave danger. Also, try not to expose your heroes, especially when Lurtz is around, you lost Faramir and Gandalf several times to his cripple power. He got the better of you today, but not a bad performance on your part.

RaNdoM|RuSH Overall Score: 5/10

This was a pretty evenly matched game, and was quite exciting. A good watch for younger players as the gameplay was pretty good. Fairly entertaining, although a boring finish (one player was trying to keep another from cheating, although I don't know if the other was cheating or not).

Overall Score: 5/10
Entertainment Value: 5/10


Review by,
The Dunedain Striker

P.S. I apologize for the wait, alot of things kept popping into my schedule.
This post has been edited by DunedainStriker: Aug 27 2006, 14:12 PM
#12THUGZ  Aug 26 2006, 18:32 PM -
Replays: 36 Game:
Awards:
thx for the review m8, i thought isengard did well considering thats a fol map imo.
#13general grievous^  Aug 26 2006, 18:42 PM -
Beating a Gondor on this map is insanely hard, 2 EWs at the 2 middle settlements and Isen won't be able to touch them for a LONG time and have a really bad economy wacko.gif
#14DunedainStriker  Aug 26 2006, 19:03 PM -
Are we suggesting a higher score for Isengard? I will take a second look if so, I wouln't want to screw somebody on a rating. I felt that since Isen had the top slot, and can reach the middle faster, that it was the Isen players fault for not getting the middle first.
#15THUGZ  Aug 26 2006, 20:08 PM -
Replays: 36 Game:
Awards:
maybe a little higher for the isengard player since it was a fol map and he won, givin them both 5 was unfair on the isen player imo.
#16DunedainStriker  Aug 27 2006, 14:12 PM -
Watched it again, took in he map bias for FoL and decided: Isen gets a 5.5 for the win. Sorry about the mistake. I will keep a closer eye on who the map is biased to in the future.
#17THUGZ  Aug 27 2006, 14:55 PM -
Replays: 36 Game:
Awards:
thum.gif
Reply to Comment