I give this game a 5 because the game lacks in micro and a good play by Isen. Gondor had a good start but i think he was lazy to change his stratergy even he lost in his first battle. Gondor built quite a good army but did not control it well, you should have built some TG to protect your combo's from his wargs.
I give this game a 5
Hi i see that this game has been [R] but there is no info here, this is something which may not have been explained for you bravo, so its not your fault, for a rating you need to include information about the match and a few points, not just a number. Also just so you know now that your a RR all reviews and ratings are edited into the first post for easy viewing, if you have any problems give me a pm and i will help you out with that, here is a link to an example of a rated game
Hi i see that this game has been [R] but there is no info here, this is something which may not have been explained for you bravo, so its not your fault, for a rating you need to include information about the match and a few points, not just a number. Also just so you know now that your a RR all reviews and ratings are edited into the first post for easy viewing, if you have any problems give me a pm and i will help you out with that, here is a link to an example of a rated game
You still need an overview of the game and a player summary for each, though the player summary is somewhat shorter. Also there's no points for improvements in Ratings, just point out any FATAL mistakes in the players summary. Rating is basically for those who know what they're doing and don't need help. I will have to check newly recruited RRS when they do ratings because they seem to get confused . If anyone has problems with a review/rating please PM me. Edit: Here's what a rating should look like: http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index...4662&st=20#
This post has been edited by SToNe^CoLd: Aug 14 2007, 21:30 PM
You still need an overview of the game and a player summary for each, though the player summary is somewhat shorter. Also there's no points for improvements in Ratings, just point out any FATAL mistakes in the players summary. Rating is basically for those who know what they're doing and don't need help. I will have to check newly recruited RRS when they do ratings because they seem to get confused . If anyone has problems with a review/rating please PM me. Edit: Here's what a rating should look like: http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index...4662&st=20#
Ok guys i am a new RR so i was bit confused with rating, so i apologise for any mistakes. I will correct my mistakes. I will redo this review.
I give this game a 5 because the game lacks in micro and a good play by Isen. Gondor had a good start but i think he was lazy to change his stratergy even he lost in his first battle. Gondor built quite a good army but did not control it well, you should have built some TG to protect your combo's from his wargs.
I give this game a 5
Hi i see that this game has been [R] but there is no info here, this is something which may not have been explained for you bravo, so its not your fault, for a rating you need to include information about the match and a few points, not just a number. Also just so you know now that your a RR all reviews and ratings are edited into the first post for easy viewing, if you have any problems give me a pm and i will help you out with that, here is a link to an example of a rated game
Rating
you can also put armies and map, but just to give you an idea