Harads were for the mumakil obviously. I see you are a rather harsh rater, everyone else is handing out free silvers but you like handing out 5s. Perfectly fine with me though because when I was an RR I was like that too. You know a game is good when you get higher then a 6 from these RRS .
Harads were for the mumakil obviously. I see you are a rather harsh rater, everyone else is handing out free silvers but you like handing out 5s. Perfectly fine with me though because when I was an RR I was like that too. You know a game is good when you get higher then a 6 from these RRS .
Lowered to a 5 due to game length (not alot of material), unusual/contraversial imba map, and a wrong host choice imo for this MU (FoL needs to host). Do not get me wrong, gameplay (outside of micro due to host) was pro.
Remember to use the new rating system too, inflating ratings. With this you are telling me this game was a 4. Right?
EDIT- That was Luan btw, its in 1st post so it says General Grievous
This post has been edited by DunedainStriker: Mar 21 2007, 01:24 AM
Without the factor of host and map, I gave it a 5. Then used the new rating system to give it a 6, then took into effect the un-normal factors such as the host and map. I felt as though for this type of match and the calibur of players, the map had some effect on the outcome. So I took the map and the fact that the FoL was not host into the overall rating.
This post has been edited by Luân^: Mar 21 2007, 02:31 AM
.
.
