Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth

[R] B2P vs Cute^

#31Daemon  Aug 21 2006, 12:59 PM -
QUOTE(general grievous^ @ Aug 21 2006, 01:45 AM) *

I'm sorry but you come back from vacation just to troll me? Locked.


There is no limit to the number of replays that a person can post on the forums but if someone did post several then they shouldn't expect to get all of them reviewed. That isn't to say that Maia posts more replays than he should though, it is just a statement of fact.

This topic should not be closed. genub, stop complaining about the number of replays posted and just review them, you started this argument off by posting first exaggerating the number of replays that Maia has posted so you can't then run away and hide behind your mod powers when he calls you out for it.

And your comments about only 2 active RR's this month are completely inaccurate. It is more like 5 with 2 more recently joined staff.
#32Mavs  Aug 21 2006, 14:35 PM -
Wow daemon, nice one.
And no, I didn't come back from vacation just to troll you....I came back because my train was scheduled to leave at a specific time...
This post has been edited by Mavsman: Aug 21 2006, 14:39 PM
#33Daemon  Aug 21 2006, 14:49 PM -
Enough bitching. This is a topic about a replay not about getting one up on any staff members. Genub made a mistake in locking the topic, that's all. That doesn't mean that everyone can start mis-behaving. smile.gif
#34jack079fx  Aug 21 2006, 15:07 PM -
Replays: 19 Game:
Awards:
ok thank you daemon for sorting the situation out, now who wants to tag this replay smile.gif
#35general grievous^  Aug 21 2006, 20:30 PM -
QUOTE(Daemon @ Aug 21 2006, 08:59 AM) *

There is no limit to the number of replays that a person can post on the forums but if someone did post several then they shouldn't expect to get all of them reviewed. That isn't to say that Maia posts more replays than he should though, it is just a statement of fact.

This topic should not be closed. genub, stop complaining about the number of replays posted and just review them, you started this argument off by posting first exaggerating the number of replays that Maia has posted so you can't then run away and hide behind your mod powers when he calls you out for it.

And your comments about only 2 active RR's this month are completely inaccurate. It is more like 5 with 2 more recently joined staff.

Um ya you're completely wrong on that last part. When I made that statement only me and Tommy were reviewing games, Guardian was reviewing games that he had tagged b4 he became SRR, everybody else was inactive. Light came back a few days after I made that statement and Shauling and DunedainStriker became RRs AFTER I made that statement, so I fail to see how I was Wrong smile.gif As an apology to Maia I will be reviewing this game.
#36Mavs  Aug 22 2006, 11:00 AM -
Good man!
#37Daemon  Aug 22 2006, 13:55 PM -
QUOTE(general grievous^ @ Aug 21 2006, 09:30 PM) *

Um ya you're completely wrong on that last part. When I made that statement only me and Tommy were reviewing games, Guardian was reviewing games that he had tagged b4 he became SRR, everybody else was inactive. Light came back a few days after I made that statement and Shauling and DunedainStriker became RRs AFTER I made that statement, so I fail to see how I was Wrong smile.gif As an apology to Maia I will be reviewing this game.


'Active' RR's is not measured on a daily basis. An inactive RR is one who has posted his inactivity in the correct staff inactivity thread or has not produced the required number of reviews to date in the month. By your criteria the active RR's list would depend upon who has reviewed today which is not the correct measure of activity. It would be too time consuming to maintain an active RR list based upon daily activity.

By the usual activity criteria there were actually 5 active RR's this month at the time of your comment. What you, perhaps, meant to say in your comment was that 'there are only 2 RR's posting reviews today' at the time of your comment which is subtly different from inactivity in a staff accounting sense from my point of view.
#38jack079fx  Aug 22 2006, 14:17 PM -
Replays: 19 Game:
Awards:
ok ok ok lol enough now, me and general have sorted our problem out and he is reviewing my rep smile.gif

thank you for ur support daemon but now i think there has been enough said and so lets get back on topic smile.gif
#39general grievous^  Aug 23 2006, 19:43 PM -
B2p|Urza-Gondor + B2p|HanNiBaL^-Isengard Vs. Cute^Sam-Gondor + Cute^SmiLey-Gondor

Map: Anorien


Version: 1.03



Team B2p|:
Bo: 2 Farms, Pippin
Pit+Furn, Mills



PP Progression: Ew, Heal, Gtw, Rohirrim Summon, Eagles
Wc, Industry, Rain, Balrog



Strategy: Knights to Gtw to ups, treb spam, Isen: Upgrades to middle to combos with Lurtz+Saruman+ballistas



Pros:
+Extra LAborers
+Helped Defened Isen mills
+Use of Beacons
+Retook middle from them nicely
+Killed MANY Heroes laugh.gif
+Nice job sneaking mines in at both of the Gondor's bases while they were fighthing your armies thumb.gif
+Balrog whip took out 2 Eagles in 1 shot laugh.gif



Cons:
-Gondor 2 many inside farms b4 stables
-No sharing of mills in early game
-Isen bo was a bit weak
-Missed LS with Gandalf a few times
-Friendly fire with trebs and ballistas


Comments: You guys played a gg, however this game should not have lasted that long. You saw they had the middle, and you harssed it quickly and never let them get it established and took it. Your Gondor had GTw out relatively fast, however you guys were a bit passive and let them get back in the game. They tried to retake middle several times, however their really bad protection of trebs in certain battles allowed you to win a few times. 1 of their Gondor's got Aod b4 Isen was even near Balrog. Eventually you defeated the Orange Gondor, who was not doing much of anything, and then you used the Balrog to defeat the remaining Gondor. Also, Isen probably should have went TL to rain instead of industry to rain, fortunately for you they assumed you had TL and didnt continue to spam it, otherwise you could have been in trouble in some of the battles


Overall Score: 5




Team Cute^:
Bo: 2 farms, Pippin
Farm, Pippin



PP Progression: Ew, Heal, GTW, Elven Allies, Eagles, AOD
Ew, Heal, Elven Allies, Rohirrim Summon, Eagles




Strategy: All farms to middle, combos/ tgs with trebs, Knights to Gandy to treb spam



Pros:
+Sharing of farms
+Boro + Fara LD
+ Killed many heroes overall
+Purple Gondor first to Reach AOD




Cons:
-Riding around in wedge alot with knights
-Really bad treb protection in key battles
-Orange really wasn't doing much of anything after he lost middle.
-Missed a few chances to dbl WA gandy+IL him



Comments: You guys played alright, but then you lost the upper hand when they took the middle from you. You guys prolonged the game for a very long time though with your trebs and combos and tgs. In certain battles your treb protection was really poor, and you ended up losing them and that was the only thing keeping you alive at 1 point, the trebuchets lol. Even though Purple got to AOD b4 they had Rog or AOd, it didn't make much of a difference because you ended up losing anyway.



OVerall Score: 4



General Notes on the game: Dbl Gondor vs Gondor Isen where the 2 Gondors tried to abuse EW to pressure Gon Isen's economy. 1 Gondor went for knights while the other made a failed attempt to reclaim middle, while Gondor isen the Gondor was going knights to Gandy and the Isen was going for upgraded combos. Couple of nice battles here and there, that was ultimately decided on who shot the most projectiles at Gandy and who lost their siege first. If you enjoy watching friendly fire ffrim siege and Gandalf dying many times in the same game, then this is the game for you laugh.gif



Entertainment: 6 (This was borderline between 5+6)



Overall Rating: 5


Rotw Contender
This post has been edited by general grievous^: Aug 23 2006, 19:44 PM
Reply to Comment