Thats not what I said at all, I didn't give it silver for the sake of having a silver game. Just trying to explain my views. And taterz silver games are all about having a high level of play, and some guy keeping some knights alive shows a high level of play
This post has been edited by velvegoriantis: Feb 8 2008, 20:13 PM
This has been discussed thousands of times in this section. We are not going to promote games "For the sake of having silvers" . Totally dumb fucking idea that I never agreed with.
No one ever said that but just explain to me what a Silver / Gold would be in your opinion.
Btw I have watched the game and I have to say that I was a little bit disappointed of the way Gammy played, because imo that was one of his weakest plays. Also Sonka lost about 2 - 3 Knights. I would say, that this is under no circumstances gold and silver if you rate it nice.
. Totally dumb fucking idea that I never agreed with.
To say a game should be Gold/Give it an outstanding because someone kept some Knights alive is just plain ridiculous.