Battle for Middle Earth

Man, I have trained you guys too well if you are that harsh.

I am not sure I could avoid losing that Rohirim batallion. The wargs were upgraded, howled and then he dropped TL and I retreated as soon as I saw the Howl and before the TL dropped and I still lost the Rohirim.

Still, I am happy with the rating.

Ty i try



I'll have to lighten up it seems

Cool game. I think the rating system is correct when you compare good games, but a 4 for this match really sounds too negative. There's also not enough differantiation with very poor games who then get a 3 .

btw: I think Palantir may have done a good job for DunadeinBonnerr espescially when his wargs were WC'ed and howled and Daemons horses were on Isen's side of the river just before he siege.

I think where there is a bigger differential is between a 5 and 6. 5 is average and everything and 6 is supposed to be proish right? So where do you draw the line between mediocrity and above average skill?

Hopefully you draw it below me.

This game gets a review after a day and some people have been wating for weeks....

Ya but other people spam like 2 games per week while this was deamons 1. since i m around

Well of course every RR needs to try and take older reps first. As long as they are one the first page its ok, but a rep postd today or yesterday should not be reviewed if there are much older reps on the first page.

But as always there are many reps and few RRs so we can only do as much as we can. But of course all RRs must try to take the reps in order. Its not like it has to be 110% correct, a few days here and there is no big problem. But if there are a rep thats been around for a week, then you cant do a rep posted today

Yeah, it's good that I got a review and all but if there were others waiting longer then we should have done those first. Anyone can still keep bumping their replay if it falls off the first page and they really want a review.

I found one on page 3 that i am doing atm but other than that i found nothing older...