Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth

[R] Luan vs. FatHips

#11tomac  Mar 9 2007, 14:30 PM -
Replays: 11 Game:
QUOTE(Nightmarelord @ Mar 9 2007, 03:26 PM) *

It's still me who decides what this is gonna be. tongue.gif



first my game huh? NML, cause you tagged my game at 8:15 and this game 8:16 banana.gif banana.gif banana.gif

wub.gif
#12ToRtUr3  Mar 9 2007, 15:05 PM -
Replays: 14 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(tomac @ Mar 9 2007, 03:30 PM) *

first my game huh? NML, cause you tagged my game at 8:15 and this game 8:16 banana.gif banana.gif banana.gif

wub.gif

ROFL! Im gonna do it one by one, as I feel like it. I think im gonna review 2 today. happy.gif
#13tomac  Mar 9 2007, 15:26 PM -
Replays: 11 Game:
Good thought sleep.gif

Btw i can't see my name on your wublist n1qshok.gif
#14ToRtUr3  Mar 9 2007, 15:44 PM -
Replays: 14 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(tomac @ Mar 9 2007, 04:26 PM) *

Btw i can't see my name on your wublist n1qshok.gif

Thats because I havnt added you! biggrin.gif

To be honest, I dont know you enough ingame/forum to add you. sad.gif
#15Luân^  Mar 9 2007, 16:22 PM -
Replays: 23 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(Nightmarelord @ Mar 9 2007, 09:26 AM) *

It's still me who decides what this is gonna be. tongue.gif




We we're just speculating sleep.gif

#16deweydecimal  Mar 10 2007, 06:34 AM -
QUOTE(LordLuan @ Mar 9 2007, 11:22 AM) *

We we're just speculating sleep.gif

Luan meant we're just speculating.... not We we're just speculating...


Luan is still a pro though....
This post has been edited by deweydecimal: Mar 10 2007, 06:35 AM
#17Poose  Mar 10 2007, 14:25 PM -
Awards:
Just another pointless post to add to ther other pointless posts in this thread
#18ToRtUr3  Mar 12 2007, 10:48 AM -
Replays: 14 Game:
Awards:
Done. Someone fix scores again and please pm me what I'm doing wrong with the rating. I just dont get it now that members can rate too.

This was a VERY frustrating review. I had this review done untill the part of the 1st Ent Rush (like 2/3 of the review) and then I accidently clicked some button and the browser closed. I forgot to save it and had to start all over again. Sorry if I missed some things out but I still think it became pretty good. frusty.gif
#19Shine  Mar 12 2007, 13:15 PM -
Replays: 3 Game:
Nice game, just watched it. But don't know why you RRes give such low grades. 5 or 6, rerely 7, almost never 8 or above. How about 9 or 10. Never heard of Gauss? It doesn't need to be an all time perfect game to be rated 10. It just needs to be excellent. Good games are 7 and 8, 9 is very good, but still not excellent. 6 is barely watchable, below 6 is crap.

This game is imo 7 at least, if not 8. We need to be less critical.
#20ToRtUr3  Mar 12 2007, 13:34 PM -
Replays: 14 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(Shine @ Mar 12 2007, 14:15 PM) *

Nice game, just watched it. But don't know why you RRes give such low grades. 5 or 6, rerely 7, almost never 8 or above. How about 9 or 10. Never heard of Gauss? It doesn't need to be an all time perfect game to be rated 10. It just needs to be excellent. Good games are 7 and 8, 9 is very good, but still not excellent. 6 is barely watchable, below 6 is crap.

This game is imo 7 at least, if not 8. We need to be less critical.

No, thats not true. This game could've even been a 5 if it wasn't for the outcome and twist of the game. We even need to be more critical.

This is how I rate games:

1. AFK (replay deleted)
2. Below noob (Shouldn't play online yet)
3. New to online play (alot of mistakes and alot of room for improvement)
4. Quite okay (Still a bunch of mistakes)
5. Watch worthy (Improving and learning out of mistakes)
6. Decent (Watch worthy and not that many mistakes anymore)
7. Skillfull (few mistakes)
8. Proalike (Barely mistakes)
9. Inhuman (No mistakes)
10. Godlike (No mistakes & entertainment pure, but impossible)

This isn't 100% accurate as I also rate by feeling. We cant toss in a 7, 8 or 9 for every little replay. There were some major mistakes in the game and therefor this score is accurate.
Reply to Comment