Strat: knights shld rush to GTW to SW/Aggressive Treb Camping
good use of pippen to harass mills good use of soldiers grabbing extra farms/defending good EW use to take out crossbows w/knights fought off Isen seige gaining PP's in the process you won
lost Gandy a few times lost some knights to pikes
ghostskill(Isengard)
Starting BO: 2 furns/mills
Strat: Fast Lurtz to upgrades pike spam to seige
used labs to grab mills uruks/laborers grabbed multiple mills early on extra labs at mills leveled lurtz/added saruman for LD nice pike micro/saved a bunch from WB
waited a bit too long to put up uruk pit a little too late with ram seige
Summary: Good game between a good Isen and good Gondor player. To me this game shows off the popular aggressive treb camp strat alot of Gondors use now. Very hard for isen to break this. Isens best chance at Gondors employing this strat is early ram rush or ladder rush. The longer it takes to seige Gondor the worse it gets for Isen due to Gondor summons. Alot of action in this game not alot of idle time. GG to both players.
Headliner(Gondor) 6.5/10
ghostskill(Isengard) 6/10
Rating: 6/10
This post has been edited by LVCIAN: Dec 6 2005, 21:49 PM
definetly i will^^ but theres somethin in my mind, tellin me i wont be succesfull...
can anyone who watched the replay tell me, why a player (my opponent) gets various "pros" and only the cons of "a little too late pit" and "too late ram rush" but his rating is just a 6 of 10? if thats all, what he did wrong, his rating must bee much higher imo!
me got only the cons of lost a few horses (two, to be correct) and gandi (two times) and get a 6,5 either....
dont blame me, but a guy called pillbots played a gon vs isen... nearly the same mistakes, same entertaining balrog aod usage and he got gold....
maybe anyone can bring that across to me...
Skip
This post has been edited by SkipToMyLou: Dec 8 2005, 19:09 PM
plz review that one...