Battle for Middle Earth

A good Gondor-Isen, lots of horses - causing probs to my wargs early on, but was a gg. Review Plz

[attachmentid=210787]

ya was a gg i thought attacking ur base with like loads of knights i wud get loads of power but u demolished everything

yeah the thing that won me this was that throughout your constant base attacks i was able to secure map control and spam out units/ballistas etc. Later on i had like 30-50k

but Saruman was awesome and was a deciding factor tbh

Now you spoilt it.

Hey guys, mind if I take this for an application review?

sure go 4 it
we need more RR's

i'll watch. lots of people do this uber aggressive base raiding these days while hardly caring about mc

After letting me host you can do what you like

JT|Blaze:

BO – Horses > HS > Upgrades > Horses > Combos/Trebs > SW


Pros:

• Some good horse/treb micro (Treb micro was darn good )
• Well-balanced final army
• Fast/Aggressive HS rush (took down Warg pit, Siegeworks, and Pit)

Cons:

• Defensive start
• Bad strategy
• Bad creeping (2/6 I believe)
• Bad horse micro at times
• Never tried to gain map control

Player Comments –

You played a pretty good game with some good micro at times but your start and strategy are definetly put into question. Always try to have an agressive start vs. Isen/Mord and put them on the defensive from the start to slow the oP economy. You made at one point an army of 6 horses vs isengard even though you knew he was fully camped at his base with pikes and wargs and by doing this, you allowed him to gain map control uncontested . You should always try to gain a little bit of map before attempting to rush his base despite doing a good job the first few times. Next time, try spamming a few soldiers during early mid-game to help with map control and don't make that many horses.


FoD}G4MROTH:

BO – Uruk spam > Pike spam > Wargs > Upgrades > Combos > Siege Spam


Pros:

• Good amount of extra laborers
• Good creeping (4/6)
• Good defense to HS rush
• Had map control for about 95% of the time
• Very quick Wargs
• Pro Balrog usage

Cons:

• Very slow upgrades
• Building placement
• Bad protection of siege

Player Comments –

Very nice textbook game Gammy (especially the Balrog ). You played the game just about as it is written up on paper except for a few things imo. The quick wargs was good but when he got your warg pit, sometimes I would just reccomend getting upgrades first and then coming back to get more wargs because his FU knights just flat out pwn'd your 2-3 un-upp'd wargs . I would also reccomend placing your pit one spot to the right. At the spot you put it in, it's got 3 sides that can be attacked from where as if you put it one spot to the right, it's still near the front for fast uruk pathways in the beginning but it's only got 2 sides it can be attacked from when you have a full base. Also, add some more pikes to your main army to help protect your mass ballistas from wandering horses.


Game Overview:

A nice game with some decent micro from both players in which Isen was forced into a camping stage due to the 6 horses from gondor . However, with mc and a nice pike/warg spam, Isen was able to keep control of the game (despite appearing to be defensive for a long period of time) and wait for rog to defeat the half-camped Gondor. Entertainment was not that high due to the lack of pressure around the map and micro from Gondor's mass horses but overall a gg lads.

JT|Blaze: 5/10

FoD}G4MROTH: 6/10

Entertainment Rating: 4/10

Overall Rating: 5/10

nice review Luan but the format is wrong. The new standard format you should use is this:

Review by: YOUR NAME

Starting positions:
NAME - POSITION
NAME - POSITION

Overview:

[TEXT]

NAME - ARMY

[TEXT]

How to Improve

NAME - ARMY

[TEXT]

How to Improve

Overall Rating: NUMBER