Battle for Middle Earth

Hi guys, its been a while since I've posted a rep on here! My first since coming back.

Really enjoyable game to play, went all the way to aotd and Balrog several times and was insanely close towards the end. Could have gone either way.

Damn, 518k . Will check it out! Come cw again Gamroth!

Yeah it lasted a while. I probably will do soon, I just want to brush up again first.

gamroth . now here is a real pro !!

Watched it. Was one of the best replays I have seen in a while. It had everything in it. I don't understand why hardly anyone has wubbed this . HoF material in my opinion.

I too found it a very enjoyable game to watch, although a little too long. But gladly you can fast forward.

Good Balrog micro would have beeen the key to the win, was a gg nevertheless.

Hmm, I am noob but I dont like that game so much.
In every tourny game I play my farms get kicked all the time, even by other noobs. In this game so many farm spots were not used for a long time or some farms were not attacked.
I never can stop uruks from harassing, but in this game Isen camped with 4 bats and lost them all at the warg creeps?!? Is this wise? He could have easily killed the 1-2 farms rohan had.
Hero micro was also not so good. Coming from bfme2 I know how important that is. It was cruel watching saruman. He never leveled his army up with his spell, he never used fireball very well. In so many situations he could have stolen the whole enemy army but he was running away...Same for Legolas. When he got Level 7 he could have killed saruman and the whole army with his speciell power. He didn´t. Or he could have used his knife attack to survive a bit longer and maybe escape from the enemy.

And like already mentioned there were a lot of micro mistakes. Horses running into pikes and so on.

Yes, in a way I agree with you. It wasnt that skilled, but very close and entertaining, so I wubbed it.
To the saruman micro: I didnt see the points you mentioned, and I can tell you that he dies so damn easily against legolas and archers that it is usually best to have him in the back. Besides that you are right though.