Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth 2

Good game and forgiven oos.

#21SN0WBL4CK  Jul 16 2018, 20:31 PM -
Replays: 17 Game:
QUOTE(TaDa! @ Today, 21:12 PM)
I was talking from perspective that if reason for such a change was half trolls crush revenge absence and considering that rotwk half trolls are the same so theoretecly it could be reason for same change in rotwk but i said that it wouldnt work for sure there. Generally i was trying to say that imo old pre 1 05 version of archers would be fine in 1 09.

But did he kill one? Ofc many little things are not exact like longshot damaging only enemies but not all as it should be or trampled units that receive damage only once despite how many horces ran over them while they were knocked down etc. But such a change is far not little. Making gobs slow and untrampable is the same if to make guardians fast and with bows and arrows instead of axes without any exaggaration. Would u like it? Its not a balance question ofc. But i think that in such a game balance should serve to authenticity and not vice versa. U cant do everything u want for thd sake of balance here.


well ofc u cant do everything for the sake of balance but i think balance is far more important than movie. Especially in cw.

Sure balance should not change the design of a faction. Even thought the design is far from perfect it is still not pulled from thin air. dwarves afe strong and slow and gobs are weak and fast etc. However i dont consider gob archers slow at all. they are not as fast as gob warriors but that would completely ruin gobs. Gob archer spam is already very strong and hard to deal with. Making gob archers faster but weaker would make them useless against men, dwarves isen and elves.


If they were not to have resistance to crush it would make them useless. They are good enough at dealing with flyers as it is. there is a tunnel system and poison arrows. Gob archers are fine.
#22Oliver de Clisson  Jul 16 2018, 20:42 PM -
QUOTE(SilverBane @ Today, 10:35 AM)


I don't see what i could possibly misunderstand? I only said OOS appeared since 1.05(1.06) and thats all.
Elf wood is dumb indeed.
I love this type of leadership so much more than 50/50 everything, but damage/ armor ratio must be normalised ( something thats happening in beta already afaik)


Sry I was refering to Stromcrow.
#23TaDa!  Jul 16 2018, 20:46 PM -
Replays: 2 Game:
QUOTE(SN0WBL4CK @ Today, 20:31 PM)


well ofc u cant do everything for the sake of balance but i think balance is far more important than movie. Especially in cw.

Sure balance should not change the design of a faction. Even thought the design is far from perfect it is still not pulled from thin air. dwarves afe strong and slow and gobs are weak and fast etc. However i dont consider gob archers slow at all. they are not as fast as gob warriors but that would completely ruin gobs. Gob archer spam is already very strong and hard to deal with. Making gob archers faster but weaker would make them useless against men, dwarves isen and elves.


If they were not to have resistance to crush it would make them useless. They are good enough at dealing with flyers as it is. there is a tunnel system and poison arrows. Gob archers are fine.

I dont say they are weak or strong, i say that they are not gobs but camouflaged dwarves with bows and arrows.
Reply to Comment