Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth 2

[Silver] Fabled vs Strategy

#21Deadshot7  Jul 17 2007, 08:30 AM -
Very well, as I respect Frawst's judgement more than my noob RR judgement, replay promoted to Silver. Gratz guys, sorry it took a while to get it there.
#22Raistlin Majere  Jul 17 2007, 17:01 PM -
Imo the mistake that many RRs do is underrating. And thinking with the fractions like 6.7 instead of plain 6 or 7 tongue.gif

I'm not saying you're underrating but idk, some do.
#23Conflict  Jul 26 2007, 00:08 AM -
Awards:
QUOTE(Deadshot7 @ Jul 14 2007, 22:14 PM) *

5 - 6: An above average game with pretty good skill and micro/macro knowledge. Players have better knowledge of game mechanics and using their respective factions over many players.. Games with good skill fall under this category. Some mistakes were still made (but no huge game costing errors were made). This is where the RotW Contenders should start beign taken from.

7: An even, entertaining game with few mistakes which didn't basically cost players the game. Games with good demonstration of the knowledge of game mechanics fall under this category. Players knew how to use their respective factions in competitive enviroment and under pressuring situations. Harass and battles were entertaining and weren't only casual. Games on this level and above run smoothly and evenly between the players and no big flaws are basically discovered in games of this level. This is where Silver Contenders can be found, and this rating shouldn't be all that common.

thoose ratings are totally bs. honestly, who thinks the yare any good at all?
Reply to Comment