Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth 2

[Silver] Fabled vs Strategy

#1FabledIntegral  Jul 9 2007, 01:42 AM -
Awards:
Was a gg. This is one of my favorite matchups as Isengard. Was about to possibly take the advantage as I had saved up a bit of money and finally was going to be able to spend them with upgrades. Then he snuck some CT to my fort sad.gif. Haven't watched it so I'm not sure if there were many mistakes, although none blatant that I saw.[attachmentid=277427]

Rating by: Deadshot

Starting positions:
|THS|Strategy-Goblins - West
FabledIntegral-Isengard - East

Version: BTP 1.7

Overview:

A fast action, constant action, action all over game. Strategy started with goblin spam whilst fabled tried to get in some lickings with an uruk rush, as well as defend with fast x-bows. The battle swayed back and forth, with fabled getting early game advantage especially with Power Points. A somewhat ill planed use of wildmen took that advantage away and the goblin+half troll+ cave troll spam strategy was using started to push fabled back. Fabled got together some groups of pikes, crossbows, lurtz, and wargs and made pushes up the middle, whilst Strategy upped to spyderlings and riders and sent them out to harass furnaces with their great speed. Fabled still had a good econ and got watcher early, but didn’t really get anything out of it’s use, and seemed to waste wildmen again. Saruman arrived on the field and upgrades were being teched when a sneak attack of 2 cave trolls brought fabled’s fort to a sliver of health, only being saved by lurtz and saruman’s fireball, which was a very close call. However, it wasn’t long before good wildmen and watcher use by strategy brought the fort down. Fabled tried to hold his remaining base but eventually succumbed to spam from 5 goblin production buildings. Overall a very action packed game with some nice battles.

Overall Rating: 6

Promoted to SILVER

REPLAY OF THE WEEK CONTENDER
This post has been edited by Deadshot7: Jul 17 2007, 08:32 AM
#2AntiElfman  Jul 9 2007, 04:22 AM -
watched, was a pretty good rep but gobs were jsut so OVERwhelming

gg though stances were off at times so i dont think it would be promoted but still a good watch
#3Conflict  Jul 9 2007, 11:58 AM -
Awards:
macro master ftw tongue.gif

just a little side note: if you have one more battalion in battle becasue of better macro you earn more on if then using the correct stances.
#4AntiElfman  Jul 9 2007, 15:12 PM -
but what if u do both o.O

btw i think rotw as far as entertainment jsut not silver or gold
#5War Eagle  Jul 10 2007, 02:58 AM -
Replays: 15 Game:
Awards:
Why does the title say [Rating] eyebrow.gif?
#6AntiElfman  Jul 10 2007, 03:08 AM -
new replay system , u can either get a full review(lesser palyers may use for improvement) or jsut an overview of the match and a rating(for the ppl that are only looking for a replay promotion)
#7CH1LD  Jul 10 2007, 18:07 PM -
Replays: 4 Game:
Awards:
lately isens had a really hard time with this mu. IDK why it swung so badly. But all of a sudden i havent seen a single isen keep up with goblins. WP.

I think its probaly due to GA's being used more and more. And that gives goblins a pretty big weapon that used to not really be used much if at all
#8kelboy  Jul 10 2007, 18:39 PM -
Replays: 1 Game:
Awards:
I hate isen v gobs.
#9Rainmaker  Jul 10 2007, 20:59 PM -
Replays: 3 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(CH1LD @ Jul 10 2007, 21:07 PM) *

lately isens had a really hard time with this mu. IDK why it swung so badly. But all of a sudden i havent seen a single isen keep up with goblins. WP.

I think its probaly due to GA's being used more and more. And that gives goblins a pretty big weapon that used to not really be used much if at all

Does Isen even have a good MU atm?

Early game against MotW maybe a slight advantage during the first few minutes.
And I've liked playing against Dwarves but I don't think Isen would really have an advantage.
#10CH1LD  Jul 11 2007, 01:25 AM -
Replays: 4 Game:
Awards:
they have the advantage vs motw. Are pretty= vs dwarves. And pretty much get raped other than that
Reply to Comment