I haven't even seen the replay to the end and I can already say it's ridicolous to give this more than 5,5.
- Flawed Micro - Flawed Stances - Flawed use of PP's (esp. Tom Bombadil) - Flawed Strats - Flawed Tactics - Using GONDOR ARCHERS, seriously, even though they got buffed they still lose to a single soldier batt 1on1. - Havoc should've saved up for rangers. - Both players failed to effectively hold any of the outposts for more than a small portion of time. - How can you promote a Gold replay where the game just sustains because both players constantly make mistakes?
Flame me all you want.
Edit 2: Okay watched a nicely entertaining ending. 6.
actually............ omfg i never thought i would say this EVER...........
balanceseeker isnt that wrong.
havoc: terrible strategy after early game. for archer/soldier combo imo:
one or two gondor archers for early support then rangers.
gandalf? wasnt the saviour imo.
could have sent one of the hurt battalions to claim those special power-tower thingys.
improvable hero micro.
used horn to stun ONE soldier battalion?
to the other guy...
didnt see how cavalry had much of an impact. could have been WAY more usefull. good hero micro imo overall nice game. didnt notice a really big mistake and thats what won you the game. slightly improvable early game but made up for it. nice game
total:
nice entertaining game, ages away from (my) gold (standarts) but still entertaining to watch.
some of your points are a little bit nitpicking though balance. ok the game is overrated + there were some big mistakes but whatever
I haven't even seen the replay to the end and I can already say it's ridicolous to give this more than 5,5.
- Flawed Micro - Flawed Stances - Flawed use of PP's (esp. Tom Bombadil) - Flawed Strats - Flawed Tactics - Using GONDOR ARCHERS, seriously, even though they got buffed they still lose to a single soldier batt 1on1. - Havoc should've saved up for rangers. - Both players failed to effectively hold any of the outposts for more than a small portion of time. - How can you promote a Gold replay where the game just sustains because both players constantly make mistakes?
Flame me all you want.
Edit 2: Okay watched a nicely entertaining ending. 6.
actually............ omfg i never thought i would say this EVER...........
balanceseeker isnt that wrong.
havoc: terrible strategy after early game. for archer/soldier combo imo:
one or two gondor archers for early support then rangers.
gandalf? wasnt the saviour imo.
could have sent one of the hurt battalions to claim those special power-tower thingys.
improvable hero micro.
used horn to stun ONE soldier battalion?
to the other guy...
didnt see how cavalry had much of an impact. could have been WAY more usefull. good hero micro imo overall nice game. didnt notice a really big mistake and thats what won you the game. slightly improvable early game but made up for it. nice game
total:
nice entertaining game, ages away from (my) gold (standarts) but still entertaining to watch.
some of your points are a little bit nitpicking though balance. ok the game is overrated + there were some big mistakes but whatever
Edit:
I haven't even seen the replay to the end and I can already say it's ridicolous to give this more than 5,5.
- Flawed Micro
- Flawed Stances
- Flawed use of PP's (esp. Tom Bombadil)
- Flawed Strats
- Flawed Tactics
- Using GONDOR ARCHERS, seriously, even though they got buffed they still lose to a single soldier batt 1on1.
- Havoc should've saved up for rangers.
- Both players failed to effectively hold any of the outposts for more than a small portion of time.
- How can you promote a Gold replay where the game just sustains because both players constantly make mistakes?
Flame me all you want.
Edit 2: Okay watched a nicely entertaining ending. 6.
actually............ omfg i never thought i would say this EVER...........
balanceseeker isnt that wrong.
havoc: terrible strategy after early game. for archer/soldier combo imo:
one or two gondor archers for early support then rangers.
gandalf? wasnt the saviour imo.
could have sent one of the hurt battalions to claim those special power-tower thingys.
improvable hero micro.
used horn to stun ONE soldier battalion?
to the other guy...
didnt see how cavalry had much of an impact. could have been WAY more usefull. good hero micro imo overall nice game. didnt notice a really big mistake and thats what won you the game. slightly improvable early game but made up for it. nice game
total:
nice entertaining game, ages away from (my) gold (standarts) but still entertaining to watch.
some of your points are a little bit nitpicking though balance. ok the game is overrated + there were some big mistakes but whatever