Explore GameReplays...

CNC Generals

Intensive CGvUC

#1Medihev`  Jan 30 2010, 23:35 PM -
Replays: 67 Game:
Awards:
pr0zor Chem and me vs Scotsfag and diamond

quite intensive 2v2, anthrax, fuel bomb, a10 included - thrilling till the end

enjoy
#2Diamond-  Jan 30 2010, 23:40 PM -
Replays: 41 Game:
Awards:
this game really seemed to be very intense smile.gif

wp by both sides with a kinda interesting strat.
too bad I forgot about to remake my cc ohmy.gif
This post has been edited by Diamond-: Jan 30 2010, 23:41 PM
#3ScOtSmAn  Jan 31 2010, 00:03 AM -

Awards:
lol is all il say biggrin.gif
#4VVendinho  Jan 31 2010, 09:44 AM -
Wtf man, how can you guys lose this wacko.gif

Scotsman is moving his 15 Palis 3 s&d Vees from left to right on the map, im thinking about a wub.
#5-Chemical-  Jan 31 2010, 10:46 AM -
Replays: 34 Game:
Pretty intense game yes. Very strong start from scots and diamond. They kept me weak the whole game with their disgustung pali gat combo tongue.gif

Very good teamplay overall from both sides. Here you can see the importance of an early tunnel at unsave supply.
Scotsman should have droped from time to time. A drop in the back of either marco's or my base would have crushed us imo
#6SubzerooO  Jan 31 2010, 20:33 PM -
Replays: 41 Game:
Scotsmans pat drop was to slow, but he played very good overal. His micro was great.
Kudo's to chemical, he kept sending 1 gatt to scots's supply the whole game long. May seem unimportant but it really harrased his cashflow.
#7squaak  Feb 1 2010, 01:31 AM -
Replays: 63 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE
Scotsmans pat drop was to slow, but he played very good overal. His micro was great.
Kudo's to chemical, he kept sending 1 gatt to scots's supply the whole game long. May seem unimportant but it really harrased his cashflow.


Really poor micro by scot during all the game here :
- wasting rockvees against scorps
- moving big groups of units on all the maps without any goal
- very bad paladin micro. Normally paladins are the right and exact counter to scorps but here, it sounded like it was the contrary and that scorps were the good counter to paladins lol.

Bad play by chemical during all the game (sry but you lost 4x more units than you killed !)

Average/good play by diamond : his early and middle game was good but he made some big mystakes then (he could have dozerhunted chemical easily, also he should have mined his entries using raxes imo since he went for mig spamm.)

Decent gameplay by marco. He was the only 1 in this game who seemed to have a real strategy and followed it or just adapted to the situation. All the other players seemed to be totally lost, and had absolutly no clue what they should do to win.

Also it sometimes looked like a no rush 1 hour game with some big camp wars including big armies !

I understand why marco posted it, cause when you see the game in the point of view of gla, it seemed very intensiv and hard and close till the end, but when you're a spectator and watch the game from another player angle, the amount of mystakes and the lack of micro is just too huge.

5/10 average game, can be fun to watch if you make abstraction of the mystakes.
This post has been edited by squaak: Feb 1 2010, 02:52 AM
#8Diamond-  Feb 1 2010, 02:40 AM -
Replays: 41 Game:
Awards:
lmaoo squaak biggrin.gif

the destructive-replay-reviewer
#9squaak  Feb 1 2010, 02:57 AM -
Replays: 63 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE
lmaoo squaak biggrin.gif

the destructive-replay-reviewer


Harder is the critic, harder would the actors work in their next movie to satisfy the critic and get an oscar smile.gif

This replay would have been much better if there wasn't such a big difference btw the level of the different players. Hard to make a very gg in these conditions ( 7 scorps > 7 palas for example wacko.gif)
#10Diamond-  Feb 1 2010, 03:24 AM -
Replays: 41 Game:
Awards:
well when I had to surrender I thought ohmy.gif wuhou we win it... but no biggrin.gif

but dont forget scots is rusty and just came back to CCG - if I had known it was him I would have cried tongue.gif

...no he's cool
Reply to Comment