Explore GameReplays...

CNC Generals

Unusual, close, actionpacked UvC, Danzor v Erfan

#1Erfan  Feb 22 2012, 13:46 PM -
Replays: 13 Game:
Awards:
Both used unusual strat, which led to a actionpacked game right from the start.

Just watch! nd Wub!
#2Murder-  Feb 22 2012, 14:49 PM -
Bit onesided, but was a pretty good game!
#3VVendinho  Feb 22 2012, 18:08 PM -
wp, if id knew you had nothing in your base i would of sneak a gat in, it was easy after the swap. Thought you rebuilt everything in main base. you had me stunned in the corner and wasting the overlord cost me the game.
#4krew  Feb 23 2012, 03:59 AM -
Awards:
This easily could have been a worthy HoF game, but dan just seems to lack the confidence to play aggressive where ever he needs to. He just defended his way to a slow death. Wubbed though
#5Rotem^1  Feb 23 2012, 12:44 PM -
Replays: 6
was ok game imo i dont like 1 side game .wp erfan
#6THEDOM-  Mar 18 2012, 12:47 PM -
Replays: 32 Game:
Awards:
Great fast start with excellent micro and macro. Both players started with an aggressive playstyle and aggressive strat which leads to one of the fastest baseswap ever. During the midgame the game lost a bit speed but still awesome micro. Erfan showed once more how good he can handle usa. First i expected a campfest of usa in the middle with blends and another supply or oil but erfan decided to spam more and more cause of the fast genpoints and good using of them by both players cause of the fast aggressive playstyle. Danzor showed once more he can defend nice too

GG wubbed
#7THEDOM-  Mar 18 2012, 12:48 PM -
Replays: 32 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE
This easily could have been a worthy HoF game, but dan just seems to lack the confidence to play aggressive where ever he needs to. He just defended his way to a slow death. Wubbed though


correct but dont tell the winner, noob!
#8Erfan  Mar 7 2015, 11:32 AM -
Replays: 13 Game:
Awards:
how did this not reach hof?
#9Diamond-  Nov 21 2015, 00:59 AM -
Replays: 41 Game:
Awards:
I just noticed and watched this replay now. Very good micro overarall by both players, but strategical wise I really have to say this is quite sad by both.

First I do not understand why USA gave China the possibility to always have a look at its base (not destroying bunker = sight there).

Then what I also cannot understand is the way how mid supplies and oils are ignored, especially by USA. After the baseswap I already thought this game is won, but China could come back quite huge. I think playing as risky is probably good entertaining-wise, but the decisions made - especially in mid game - were quite bad.

Too much camping on China side, too many risks on USA side, led to a very entertaining game with very good micro involved, but from a strategical aspect there are quite some mistakes in this.

I liked the replay though for its uncommon style. GG & wub
Reply to Comment