Explore GameReplays...

CNC Generals

China ChegueV vs DanZoR GLA

#21squaak  May 17 2010, 20:57 PM -
Replays: 63 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE
QUOTE
Your Dual WF GvC Vs Danzor, thats not an ordinary GvC. But I didnt said it wasent a GG did i now?

dual wf is ordinary gvc. you didnt say u like it either so what do i need to expect then ?

Just make yourself a reason.
Besides CvC's, the other matchs up inclding china don't really attract people. The gameplay of UvC or GvC is always too standard and its a slow gameplay, much less intensive than big rockvees vs tech/rpg battles.
So you'll hardly get postives votes for those games, even if they're very good for an expert player point of view.
#22SubzerooO  May 18 2010, 16:27 PM -
Replays: 41 Game:
QUOTE
QUOTE
QUOTE
Your Dual WF GvC Vs Danzor, thats not an ordinary GvC. But I didnt said it wasent a GG did i now?

dual wf is ordinary gvc. you didnt say u like it either so what do i need to expect then ?

Just make yourself a reason.
Besides CvC's, the other matchs up inclding china don't really attract people. The gameplay of UvC or GvC is always too standard and its a slow gameplay, much less intensive than big rockvees vs tech/rpg battles.
So you'll hardly get postives votes for those games, even if they're very good for an expert player point of view.

#23trve^viking  May 18 2010, 17:08 PM -
Awards:
QUOTE
QUOTE
QUOTE
Your Dual WF GvC Vs Danzor, thats not an ordinary GvC. But I didnt said it wasent a GG did i now?

dual wf is ordinary gvc. you didnt say u like it either so what do i need to expect then ?

Just make yourself a reason.
Besides CvC's, the other matchs up inclding china don't really attract people. The gameplay of UvC or GvC is always too standard and its a slow gameplay, much less intensive than big rockvees vs tech/rpg battles.
So you'll hardly get postives votes for those games, even if they're very good for an expert player point of view.


thats wrong imo, i like to watch uvc and gvc games tongue.gif
#24jWz  May 20 2010, 14:00 PM -
Replays: 0
great game wow.
Reply to Comment