I didn't really "manspam" because pilbots has mad micro and he always owns it. So just Gatt spam with the odd Lo/Tc and tech up rather fast works the best vs him.
I didn't really "manspam" because pilbots has mad micro and he always owns it. So just Gatt spam with the odd Lo/Tc and tech up rather fast works the best vs him.
Well if you have tryed it without success you idea is better, wp
the worst parts being when i thought i had him owned but his napalm migs flying on the other side of the map sunk my hummers or when i just missed getting hold the line off or when i ran my loaded hummers into mines ffs
This post has been edited by Pilbots: Sep 25 2005, 15:24 PM
Was really very good game, with good big battles, with good strategy moving, with really close end of the game. I like that game very much, cos both players had played very well, so maybe needless losing of vees by usa when he had attacked AF also usa should pay a bit more attentions for lend mines. But i like your agressive style and anyway you did great job in the game. So tank had played actually good, especially i like your idea with dual OP per flanks, it was just great, and i like how you put AF behind the WF to avoid A10 attack, so dunno maybe you do not think as i said but it works pretty well also i want to mark the lend mines drops, was just beautiful. I think in general this game can pretend on Elite position , so i rated it 7.5/10.
This post has been edited by Burzum: Sep 27 2005, 22:17 PM
yes or using a potentiel lotus , that's a risk!