Oh man how to wreck Defcon with nuke, the first victim IDK how many prongs that even was like 3 maybe even 4? No chance for him, and then they be like look at middle dude! Screw middle
Just watch me(purple) and see how ez defcon is at times, maybe they noob but theres still 4 of them and they have the entire middle and better armies so I say its fair
and a point worth mentioning once I watched it back is how when I invaded base 1, notice how I leave all front bunker intact. Ok to some people this is obvious but alot of people will feel the need to boot those bunker and lsoe 15 units in the process. But why?> If I leave all those bunker there the enemy is actually defending my own base for me. I went on to kill that entire team here but I have had games where I have done the same thing and then focussed on other side keeping that first player alive almost under occupation. It works better in ffa but sometimes on defcon you dont always need to kill someone and its better to keep them alive espcially if u treat them nice and make a common enemy. If you dont understand that then play more and you will see these scenarios genuinely can exist, I would let a player have a supply in ffa if they let me have their oils.. And well if he rebels do back to him 4 fold what he did to you, and it will be a good relationship. This shit does work, best in FFA tho so you dont have their mate interfering
This post has been edited by JarmenElectra: Mar 27 2019, 20:31 PM
True but if I send bms early then they be like he is a rusher and bunker hard. I prefer a 3/4 min hard rush these days where I secure base properl first. I lost a lot of ground units tbh due to the lix's being my focus. It is a mistake to focus air most of the time on defcon but in this game the lixes were game winner vs the dual glas once they worn down from ground. It wasn’t perfect but it is a good example of how to dominate defcon with a somewat bad army? Wasted units in middle where I didn’t want to go, saw my mate is engagin there and had powers so I went there even though I wouldnt have unless my mate had... (people shoudl jsut listen to me or I shouldnt listen to others, fatal mistake that is, although in 2v2 if ur getting wrecked dont expect much help from me because they jsut want to distract my attack which I wont sacrifice for my noob mate)
I used to always go full rush and things like bms would be spammed but a staggered rush fck them over so much, they assume im noob. Hard rushing in 2v2v2 only works vs nubs and rarely wins the game imo for instance truck rush won’t win u the whole map and if it goes wrong u fcked urself over for having an unsafe u cant mine.
If Usa was next me I go red guard promo,I look at what their mate has but dont use primary promotion for them on the assumption if im China I prolly got 3 star after first enemy is defeated and then the troop crawler probably not even needed at that point. But yea a lot of ground units died in the process, or more then maybe should hav, surprizsed how many I lost tbh.
When it comes to 2v2v2 I sound so big headed aqnd im certainly not the best 2v2v2 player by any means but I understand 2v2v2 or FFA on Defcon very well and listening to noobs mates is normally a fatal error...
GGGGGGG this is why I will never play with you on my team again.. For example, you need baby sitting from a truck rush half the time and you waste my oppurtunities to attack because you cant defend. The AFG'S really make me laugh where they make zero base defence and go straight to raptor, then when they die they blame me for not defending them LOL! You have got to be a complete fking idiot to assume your random as defcon mate is gonna protect ur base for you in 3mins, make a firebase you nublets or just get better??? If I have mates like this then yes I quit out, im not doing all the fking dirty work and giving you free wins. I dont expect anyone to defend me and I learnt that the hard way, and I expect the same bacK. i'm not saying I wouldnt help someone but if they make zero fking effort to defend themselves or have 0 kills at 10/20 mins in then im quitting out. Understand this please players who whinge about me quitting, why should I give 100% and u 10%? Do you know how many times I got wrecked on defcon from bad mates???? I win with or without you, defending you is a distraction and destorys my momentum
Sorry this turned into rant but I have to quit a good 25%of games due to terrible mate who have 0 kill after 17mins.... I cant and wont give people wins, you have to make effort. Even if you lost all ur units IDC, at least you tried dude and I will repsect that and you will see me in the game to my last building. But you do nothing and im outta there and if you really piss me off then i will sell all. Makes me laugh really that 60/70% of my defeats on defcon were because I quit in winning positions due to my useless mate, even easy comp have mroe kills then half of them. Makes the point of wearing prevalent nics more important because noob join me otherwise.. The msot annoying thing about Defcon is utter garbage mates who make me want to delete the game, GGGGGG yes im focusiing you but you do fck all until 27mins in, you forever will be a total noob (hope you read this)
This post has been edited by JarmenElectra: Mar 29 2019, 21:12 PM
You said one of the strongest armies... let's say your are middle nuke. what can you do vs middle inf/all usas (mid usa always go fast vees) vs glas its debatable.
I used to love playing as Nuke back when 3 vs 3 Defcon was active on the old server, it felt so much more exciting than Tank or MiG general, but Logica would be in the game and then the party was over.
Sorry is true, I uploaded this to wrong place to be honest. Its not a replay to be like oh hey look how amazing this game was, it was more a replay for newer defcon players to look at and maybe get an idea of how defcon works and or learn something. There just isnt any other active replay place really, like only Leikeze and me look at the strategy forums and im pretty sure he already knows what to do
Screw middle
Just watch me(purple) and see how ez defcon is at times, maybe they noob but theres still 4 of them and they have the entire middle and better armies so I say its fair
and a point worth mentioning once I watched it back is how when I invaded base 1, notice how I leave all front bunker intact. Ok to some people this is obvious but alot of people will feel the need to boot those bunker and lsoe 15 units in the process.
But why?> If I leave all those bunker there the enemy is actually defending my own base for me. I went on to kill that entire team here but I have had games where I have done the same thing and then focussed on other side keeping that first player alive almost under occupation. It works better in ffa but sometimes on defcon you dont always need to kill someone and its better to keep them alive espcially if u treat them nice and make a common enemy. If you dont understand that then play more and you will see these scenarios genuinely can exist, I would let a player have a supply in ffa if they let me have their oils.. And well if he rebels do back to him 4 fold what he did to you, and it will be a good relationship. This shit does work, best in FFA tho so you dont have their mate interfering