Explore GameReplays...

CNC Zero Hour

Great 2v2 FC vs HH Battle of the Titans!

#11dilmak  Jul 10 2009, 14:24 PM -
Replays: 9 Game:
Nice to watch. Well played. Gg. Wubbed.
#12Apostle^^  Jul 12 2009, 13:38 PM -
Replays: 0 Game:
Hey gg, would of been better if FC were victors.
#13VeDz  Jul 16 2009, 21:22 PM -
Replays: 4 Game:
Awards:
Bump. The closing votes to get into the HoF were 2 for no, 10 for yes. Why isn't it in HoF? That's 80% for yes and 20% for no. Only needs 70% to qualify.
http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index...howtopic=510915
#14-HaTeR-  Jul 16 2009, 22:45 PM -

Awards:
12 votes are not enough to have a valid HoF entry, afaik. Gonna get meth on this.
This post has been edited by -HaTeR-: Jul 16 2009, 22:53 PM
#15xFactor  Jul 17 2009, 02:09 AM -
Bahumat's replay got 11 votes and was voted in. So I think ours having 12 is fine.

-E- I just checked and either someone put it there or the system did it without notifying us but it is in the HoF section.
This post has been edited by xFactor: Jul 17 2009, 02:48 AM
#16MrX  Jul 17 2009, 05:56 AM -
Replays: 573 Game:
Awards:
It's a shame that such a replay is in the hall of fame.
When I see how the Nuke-player looses all his units in begin, i get really depressed.
We have tons of replays which are better than this.
#17Tr][ky  Jul 17 2009, 07:33 AM -
Replays: 122 Game:
Awards:
qq
#18methuselah  Jul 17 2009, 15:02 PM -
QUOTE
It's a shame that such a replay is in the hall of fame.
When I see how the Nuke-player looses all his units in begin, i get really depressed.
We have tons of replays which are better than this.


Instead of saying it is a shame that this one made the Hall when there are better replays that did not.......I'm not opposed to revisiting older replays when appropriate for another look. We all know that some replays did not make it simply because some people felt like a vote for a HoF replay was the same as a wub.......meaning support for the system.

Even if you hate the system if the replay is worthy it should be in there. Feel free to nominate away.

QUOTE
Bahumat's replay got 11 votes and was voted in. So I think ours having 12 is fine.

-E- I just checked and either someone put it there or the system did it without notifying us but it is in the HoF section.


Weird. Could be why the message is missing as well I'll fix that. System glitch I guess.
#19-Wraith^  Jul 17 2009, 15:37 PM -
QUOTE

Instead of saying it is a shame that this one made the Hall when there are better replays that did not.......I'm not opposed to revisiting older replays when appropriate for another look. We all know that some replays did not make it simply because some people felt like a vote for a HoF replay was the same as a wub.......meaning support for the system.

Even if you hate the system if the replay is worthy it should be in there. Feel free to nominate away.

This is not the only problem. People are voting for the players and not the replays. That is simply the entire problem.

QUOTE

Weird. Could be why the message is missing as well I'll fix that. System glitch I guess.

There was a HoF poll vote about it in the Gens discussion since I just made a portal post for it.
#20xFactor  Jul 17 2009, 18:09 PM -
MrX I think it is a shame that my replay last month didn't get into the HoF. I mean wasn't it the most downloaded/wubbed replay. Everyone said, "very good game" or most people did yet it didn't make it into the HoF. I agree, this game wasn't as good as MiRaGE's but it sure was just as good as Bahumats replay which recently made it in.
Reply to Comment