I have to confess that I've been enjoying the replays of this guy. It's bullshit, and I'd hate to play him, but they're fun to watch. When was the last time we saw new strategies from a British player? When Sepha and Seb played them in like 2010? Besides the ToV shit anyway.
This strategy could be impossible to deal with once he works it out. Back cap more with the LT (I didn't know he got one shot by Snipers in the BC), MG instead of second Mortar, get something other than Churchills since you needed Storms anyway.
I have to confess that I've been enjoying the replays of this guy. It's bullshit, and I'd hate to play him, but they're fun to watch. When was the last time we saw new strategies from a British player? When Sepha and Seb played them in like 2010? Besides the ToV shit anyway.
This strategy could be impossible to deal with once he works it out. Back cap more with the LT (I didn't know he got one shot by Snipers in the BC), MG instead of second Mortar, get something other than Churchills since you needed Storms anyway.
ye mg and mort behind hadge on road. and if he would take +16 fuel and no medic and switch into stuarts, or switch to t3, from thisposicion he would easyly take all right and control +1 sector from left == gg imho
I am not sure this brit strategy is really efficient. It seems weak against a heavy wehr t1. His HQ doesn't secure fuel or ammo, doesn't provide bonuses on fuel or ammo... He lost everything, starting from infantry, and finally, Churchills...
I am not sure this brit strategy is really efficient. It seems weak against a heavy wehr t1. His HQ doesn't secure fuel or ammo, doesn't provide bonuses on fuel or ammo... He lost everything, starting from infantry, and finally, Churchills...
Kind of a high risk, high reward strategy. I think if he managed to secure a fuel that would be enough for a stuart. There wouldn't be any anti-tank on the field and no munitions. That's gg.
I am not sure this brit strategy is really efficient. It seems weak against a heavy wehr t1. His HQ doesn't secure fuel or ammo, doesn't provide bonuses on fuel or ammo... He lost everything, starting from infantry, and finally, Churchills...
Kind of a high risk, high reward strategy. I think if he managed to secure a fuel that would be enough for a stuart. There wouldn't be any anti-tank on the field and no munitions. That's gg.
yea because you have to select or vet or t2 and with no vet huge t1 useless. resourses bonuses not that important. more important posicion. OP gives +10 more, if you put HQ on cut off and cut even 1 100% enemy secor + 10 it is the same.
I am not sure this brit strategy is really efficient. It seems weak against a heavy wehr t1. His HQ doesn't secure fuel or ammo, doesn't provide bonuses on fuel or ammo... He lost everything, starting from infantry, and finally, Churchills...
Kind of a high risk, high reward strategy. I think if he managed to secure a fuel that would be enough for a stuart. There wouldn't be any anti-tank on the field and no munitions. That's gg.
yea because you have to select or vet or t2 and with no vet huge t1 useless. resourses bonuses not that important. more important posicion. OP gives +10 more, if you put HQ on cut off and cut even 1 100% enemy secor + 10 it is the same.
Yeah exactly, only the pace of the game gets elongated because the fuel arrives later.
Well, anyway brits have huge weaknesses... Whereas in coh2, they have cheap mobile at guns and machine guns, they have a more resistant mortar position, better tanks, especially the "comet". In coh1, it is incredibly more difficult to counter panthers with brits.
most of people never seen this so go ahead