Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

1 hour of pure madness! (both went low vp)

#1Argentinosaurus  Mar 20 2019, 04:20 AM -
Replays: 76
Awards:
Ok boys, sweet lord! Hope you will enjoy this nightmare vs position 9 chinese player.
My forces suffered uncountable casualties.. so did him!
Intense game since the early stages.

It contains vet 3 snipers, shermans, riflemen... and even at gun --> got 4 stugs with a single at gun in less than 1 min I think.

Surely it will goes to my best replays trophy collection wink.gif
#2TheChip  Mar 20 2019, 16:45 PM -
Replays: 26
this bloodbath was really intense. gotta love the vet 3 at gun kappa ^^ some mistakes on both sides especially no vet from wehr the whole game. anyways great replay wubbb
#3Argentinosaurus  Mar 20 2019, 18:00 PM -
Replays: 76
Awards:
I'm glad you liked it man! wink.gif
#4piwawsky  Mar 21 2019, 14:47 PM -
Replays: 204 Game:
Awards:
wow, must be one of better games I've seen in 2019!
So much carnage, so many destroyed tanks, dead snipers, infantry,...really nice comeback you made but I'm sure he would win if he would build 2 things!
1. rep bunker
2. veterancy

wubbed! gg
#5Argentinosaurus  Mar 21 2019, 16:38 PM -
Replays: 76
Awards:
QUOTE(piwawsky @ Today, 14:47 PM)
wow, must be one of better games I've seen in 2019!
So much carnage, so many destroyed tanks, dead snipers, infantry,...really nice comeback you made but I'm sure he would win if he would build 2 things!
1. rep bunker
2. veterancy

wubbed! gg


Not so sure about rep bunker winning him the game, but definitely the lack of veterancy!
Thx for the reply bro wink.gif
#6MoreLuckPlease  Mar 23 2019, 18:27 PM -
Replays: 252 Game:
lol what a massacre n1qshok.gif seems china's army doesnt need veterancy, kills by masses ^^ biggrin.gif
#7Nobbit  Mar 25 2019, 16:09 PM -
Replays: 11
Haha your flamer triggered his mine and killed nearly the volx in early game =)

nice vet3 Sherman, all your tanks survived quite nice and quite long gg

but true with vet2 tanks it would be hard or if he would use this ftf once or early 88
Reply to Comment