pfff, isnt it the "big horse" who claimed PE is ok and ppl just don't know how to play?
Nothing changed since 13, April, yes? And show me where i claimed 'people just don't know how to play'.
Yes, iht pin changed and t17 was nerfed, that's not much, because when u MUST use iht or lose that's fucked up, PE was fucked up already in 2.4, 2.5 etc, and when I was saying PE is fucked up and u claimed it is OK that is the same thing as claiming: me and a few guys who said the same as me, don't know how to play and u will show us. Now u probably just don't want to admit we were right, but who cares. I'm glad finally Seph is doing the right job, I have respect for him and hopefully Relic have respect for him and will listen to him.
This post has been edited by king wins: Jul 14 2009, 15:05 PM
Yes, iht pin changed and t17 was nerfed, that's not much, because when u MUST use iht or lose that's fucked up, PE was fucked up already in 2.4, 2.5 etc, and when I was saying PE is fucked up and u claimed it is OK that is the same thing as claiming: me and a few guys who said the same as me, don't know how to play and u will show us. Now u probably just don't want to admit we were right, but who cares. I'm glad finally Seph is doing the right job, I have respect for him and hopefully Relic have respect for him and will listen to him.
Both IHT and AC were changed, and that's a lot, cause they are core units of PE and had great impact on early and mid-game, which they don't have now. With those units being strong, US infantry wasn't such problem as it is nowadays, and PE had much fewer troubles with map-control. If you don't think that's a lot, i disagree here with you.
And if you think that disagreement with you is something more, than an opinion, and it is the same thing as claiming something, that's not my problem, i can't and don't want to fight with something living only in your mind. In 2.4 i said PE was ok and posted a replay pack with some games, illustrating my opinion on that question. If you concluded from that, that you didn't know how to play, I can only feel sorry. Unfortunately, other people, who have different opinion on some questions, don't make such conclusions, displaying their fantasies as something I have ever said.
Well done rizky. for the ppl who said AWM is unstoppable or won it for him, you are way off. I dont think PE is sooo weak where Horse couldnt have won, instead of spending resource on PGs he should have pumped out more Battle groups and Marders. I think, just my opinion, Horse made a mistake about where he was spending his resources. He had the right idea about teching to the BG but he should have had marders out on the field too. 2 more marders and an AC/IHT combo would have been better then keeping his PGs fully reinforced. marders to support panthers, AC/IHT to lockdown remaining rifles and engies Rizky had on the field. Rizky, GJ! wub.
This post has been edited by sunnyxsniper: Jul 16 2009, 17:35 PM
Was a good game. However, I think USA played a bit poorly mid game. Got lost in other micro or something. Like when he was battling in the middle: riflemen, engineers, and a Sherman....and then the lone M8 sitting there on the opposite side, not doing anything.
