Not 1 Staghound was produced in this replay. But Wehrmacht pios were sure spammed.
Great game. WP to both players.
I was responding to a comment made by a user, not to the replay and not to KoreanArmy. No one said there were stags in this.
No where in my comment did I say, "IronCross says there was Staghound spam in this game." What I said was, " Not 1 Staghound was produced in this replay." I said this as an example of a great Brit player winning without Staghounds.
well, very bad desicions from siberians side, for example building a bunker so near brits teritorry that was for sure a dead bunker.And seriously, this strat is shit vs brits, better try full t1 power with mgs and then go blitz on stormtroopers who is a lot better than mass grens, which was a bad shit when he was losing microfights. Sometimes combination of flamer mg and volk can scrub carrier and if you are lucky it could drive into mine, but i did not saw anything like this, so bad play, not a good that someone mentioned that botyh played well. This is nottrue
Like staghound spam?
Not 1 Staghound was produced in this replay. But Wehrmacht pios were sure spammed.
Great game. WP to both players.
I was responding to a comment made by a user, not to the replay and not to KoreanArmy. No one said there were stags in this.
No where in my comment did I say, "IronCross says there was Staghound spam in this game." What I said was, " Not 1 Staghound was produced in this replay." I said this as an example of a great Brit player winning without Staghounds.
Didn't say you said they were in this replay.
Cheers.
Ahh I see I misunderstood you there!