Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

Time to quit coh1

#1Arashenstein  Sep 25 2022, 01:09 AM -

Replays: 79 Game:
Awards:
I am done, every game is the same with additional hidden skills...
#2Volkl  Sep 25 2022, 07:27 AM -
Replays: 0 Game:
Some Brit units and abilities are ridiculously overpowered but I saw no evidence of a maphack in this replay. In fact, I saw several contra-indications of a maphack. For some reason your Wehr teammate stuffed two MGs into damaged structure. They were there for several minutes before Kindawn artied them AND he had sight on the structure at the time. His 25 pounder had been completed nearly two minutes before he fired it. If he were maphacking there would be no reason for such a lengthy delay.

Secondly he fired his second barrage on a KNOWN bunker emplacement rather than the 5 enemy squads standing near it. Only when his stuart went in for a look did he fire his other 25 pounder on the infantry blob. Again, he had legitimate sight.

Third, his stuart chased your mortar half track and was destroyed from behind by a pak. Highly unlikely if said player were maphacking.

Maphackers are a real problem. But I didn't see it in this replay.
#3Arashenstein  Sep 25 2022, 22:24 PM -

Replays: 79 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(Volkl @ Today, 07:27 AM)
Some Brit units and abilities are ridiculously overpowered but I saw no evidence of a maphack in this replay. In fact, I saw several contra-indications of a maphack. For some reason your Wehr teammate stuffed two MGs into damaged structure. They were there for several minutes before Kindawn artied them AND he had sight on the structure at the time. His 25 pounder had been completed nearly two minutes before he fired it. If he were maphacking there would be no reason for such a lengthy delay.

Secondly he fired his second barrage on a KNOWN bunker emplacement rather than the 5 enemy squads standing near it. Only when his stuart went in for a look did he fire his other 25 pounder on the infantry blob. Again, he had legitimate sight.

Third, his stuart chased your mortar half track and was destroyed from behind by a pak. Highly unlikely if said player were maphacking.

Maphackers are a real problem. But I didn't see it in this replay.

Well apparently someone "wubbed" the replay who enjoyed this playstyle.
#4pwnstick  Sep 26 2022, 08:11 AM -
Replays: 76
Awards:
Dude you lost 3 squads and your ATHC before 10 minutes. It doesnt even matter what "playstyle" the brits are playing at that point. Obviously brits own Rails, not sure what else to see here.

Wubbing for the years of crying about the abuse in this game.
#5Erdvermampfa  Sep 26 2022, 09:18 AM -
Replays: 2 Game:
I think Arashenstein was just a bit to suspicious because we had a match the same day where it was 100% and completely without a doubt maphack from an opponent (I could tell the username if you want).

I don't see anything too questionable here either although Max (who isn't a nobody) suspected it too. And unfortunately PE had some pretty brutal losses that are hard to compensate.
#6Volkl  Sep 26 2022, 10:39 AM -
Replays: 0 Game:
Max seems to suggest that Allies must have maphack because the arty killed the MGs. This is easily shown to be without merit.

Mberts stuart approaching a pak head-on also seemed to be a point of contention. If he were maphacking, why not flank the pak? He was so intent on killing the mortar half-track that he lost his stuart to another pak. How was it that he failed to see this second pak? If the goal were to kill the mortar half-track all along, why not simply drive to it directly and avoid the pak altogether which was blocked by the hedge. Too many inconsistencies that don't fit the narrative.
#7Arashenstein  Sep 27 2022, 16:06 PM -

Replays: 79 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(pwnstick @ Yesterday, 08:11 AM)
Dude you lost 3 squads and your ATHC before 10 minutes. It doesnt even matter what "playstyle" the brits are playing at that point. Obviously brits own Rails, not sure what else to see here.

Wubbing for the years of crying about the abuse in this game.

I lost a full HP squad on one rifle grenade that randomly flies to them and I gave up playing on that moment. You know it is called "Frustration". 4th match in a row against dual brits on same map...
#8bulatcr  Sep 27 2022, 16:12 PM -
Replays: 37 Game:
Awards:
Arashenstein is known false accuser. Even if maphack really involved into some game, I still would be very careful with his accusations.
I have been called as maphacker and stream cheater few times by him.
Here is one of this games, when I was complete noob still got accused by Arshenstein.
https://www.gamereplays.org/companyofheroes...s&id=297443
and the chat is next:
https://snipboard.io/678r0T.jpg

I want to ask admins like djw2104, how arashenstein became an admin with his behaviour, attitude towards other players?
#9Volkl  Sep 28 2022, 00:56 AM -
Replays: 0 Game:
QUOTE(bulatcr @ Today, 08:12 AM)
Arashenstein is known false accuser. Even if maphack really involved into some game, I still would be very careful with his accusations.
I have been called as maphacker and stream cheater few times by him.
Here is one of this games, when I was complete noob still got accused by Arshenstein.
https://www.gamereplays.org/companyofheroes...s&id=297443


Bulatcr, I made a contemporaneous analysis of that replay and what I found suspect in your actions. You offered no explanation for these questionable actions and instead attacked me for analyzing the replay. Most disturbing was diverting your pio (no minesweeper) that was halfway to the left VP for low priority duties in the middle of the map. Meanwhile you upgraded a pio at your HQ with minesweeper and sent that one instead to cap the VP that was mined. Mines which you had no legitimate knowledge of. Very odd choice to make when you are bleeding VPs. It doesn't prove anything but it is a fair observation.

For those wanting to review Bulat's replay, the pioneers halfway to the left VP plant a mine on the road at the 6:00 mark before moving to the middle. The pioneers back at the HQ are upgraded with a minesweeper at 6:05 and then proceed to defuse the mine in front of the left VP.
This post has been edited by Volkl: Sep 28 2022, 07:10 AM
#10bulatcr  Sep 29 2022, 14:40 PM -
Replays: 37 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(Volkl @ Yesterday, 00:56 AM)


Bulatcr, I made a contemporaneous analysis of that replay and what I found suspect in your actions. You offered no explanation for these questionable actions and instead attacked me for analyzing the replay. Most disturbing was diverting your pio (no minesweeper) that was halfway to the left VP for low priority duties in the middle of the map. Meanwhile you upgraded a pio at your HQ with minesweeper and sent that one instead to cap the VP that was mined. Mines which you had no legitimate knowledge of. Very odd choice to make when you are bleeding VPs. It doesn't prove anything but it is a fair observation.

For those wanting to review Bulat's replay, the pioneers halfway to the left VP plant a mine on the road at the 6:00 mark before moving to the middle. The pioneers back at the HQ are upgraded with a minesweeper at 6:05 and then proceed to defuse the mine in front of the left VP.

You think I remember what was I think in a game from 2014?
You can ask community of coh1 though.
I stream all of my games on twitch.
Tournament games are recorded on youtube.
And I am pretty sure in any game you can find suspicious moments. What about the moment you are talking about? Why would I send pio to cap without sweeper? Basic game mechanics.
Reply to Comment