Company of Heroes

second

I impressed myself. I rarely wub my own replays lol.

Watched this from Kot's POV + used COHRA:

2 ketten start, 3 PGs, IHT*2, mortar, AC, ATHTs.

Jeep start from US but can't keep the kettens at bay.

03:30: 2 PGs (3rd is building T2) get pushed back but can hold the cutoff. US starts to cap back the map.

04:40: Supporting IHT helps to push US back to their base. 2nd IHT and mortar show up, 1 IHT lost (BARs).

Lack of AT ends the game in US' favour. ATHTs can't fight M10s, especially when there is no muni for Thread Break -- but Falls still marveling at their FG42s .

Shows the lack of firepower during early game caused by investing in T2 and 2 IHTs instead of PGrens. And ATHTs may be sufficient vs. M8s but as time goes by without T3 units showing up you should suspect T4 and invest in hard-hitting AT, especially when you don't see Airborne or Infantry abilities and have to suspect Armor Company.

Luftwaffe vs. Armor, 20 minutes

Important notice: This replay contains a heroic vet 2 jeep!

Dude are you watching the same replay as me? The jeep more then paid off, even if I didn't kill all of his Kettens I at least stalled them from capping and used it for more then just ketten harassment.

The jeep didn't prevent a single cap by the kettens for the 1st 5 minutes, it just delayed capping of a VP for about 1 second. That's "can't keep the kettens at bay" and is not meant to criticize your play.

You do make very good use of it during the game but that isn't the point. I'm mostly interested in initial BOs and strats like a 2IHT start. And the lack of firepower during early game caused problems for this start, not your jeep.

But to help you get over the loss in this round I added a honorable mention of your jeep to my initial post .