That P4 is a worthy Whittman contender. I can't help but feel that Sandland would have benefited from Armor or Airborne more. Very entertaining replay!
con: some of the most amateurish and worst tank micro I've ever seen in my life. I lost count how many Tigers you lost. You invaded his base and apparently "let him go" because you had both tanks shooting at different buildings, and completely worthless buildings at that which gave him time to build up his tanks and destroy your whole tank force. If you would have focus fired both tanks onto his tank building and then barracks it would have been game over. Shaking my head...
Also most of the game you had a Panzer IV sitting on right side of map and you didn't support your left side with him during moments when they really could have used him
Sandland: You on the other hand had incredible tank control. That trap you set on his Tiger was one of the most brilliant tank assaults ever. You pinned him in a pincer maneuver and destroyed his deer-in-headlights Tiger.
Con: You have some of the most awful nade response I've ever seen. I literally think you lost the match due to this. You lost about 5-6 ENTIRE SQUADS just to nade strikes. It was literally shocking how many squads were annihilated in their entirety by well placed nades. Towards the end you ran out of men because of this.
Other thing is, you didn't micro your AT guns too well. You USED them well but when they were not being used you seemed to have forgotten about them and most of them got annihilated in the end just sitting in place and not retreating.
Kind of funny in this match the way I see it, DrHorse had awful armor play and awesome infantry play, Sandland had awful infantry play and amazing armor play.