Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

ComeBack ! Motar vet2 / vs Def Heavy on langres

#1B_Sky_IIRevolutionII  Jun 25 2017, 13:16 PM -
Replays: 143
Awards:
The start was super hard, luckily I held my with this mortar, which saved us! And this M8 what a true friend!
#2piwawsky  Jun 25 2017, 20:24 PM -

Replays: 203 Game:
Awards:
That was a nice comeback, nice to see!
U had 3 MVPs this game if u ask me:
mortar in the early game and
m8 (27 kills) + pershing (44 kills) in the late game. both vet 3 wink.gif

gg wp, wubbed!
#3B_Sky_IIRevolutionII  Jun 26 2017, 08:45 AM -
Replays: 143
Awards:
QUOTE(piwawsky @ Yesterday, 20:24 PM)
That was a nice comeback, nice to see!
U had 3 MVPs this game if u ask me:
mortar in the early game and
m8 (27 kills) + pershing (44 kills) in the late game. both vet 3 wink.gif

gg wp, wubbed!

Haha thank you, I could not really do otherwise with such an aggressive smile.gif
#4ahmed gmy  Jun 27 2017, 08:44 AM -
Replays: 13
am not very pro but i think that happy made such a very noobish mistakes in that game for ex he didnt get any kind of anti tanks although in early game he didnt see any airborn or rangers he only got them after he had already lost most of his units and map control cause of the m8 and pershing and who on earth uses defencive doctorin in 1vs1 against usa maybe good vs brits but its totally useless vs usa compared to the other doctorins and he had a very late reaction against your snipers after u had already destroyed his units with those 2 snipers he even tried to kill them with nebels!!!! , but great comeback though........
This post has been edited by ahmed gmy: Jun 27 2017, 09:13 AM
#5DesertDust  Jun 27 2017, 18:17 PM -
Replays: 20 Game:
QUOTE(ahmed gmy @ Today, 08:44 AM)
am not very pro but i think that happy made such a very noobish mistakes in that game for ex he didnt get any kind of anti tanks although in early game he didnt see any airborn or rangers he only got them after he had already lost most of his units and map control cause of the m8 and pershing and who on earth uses defencive doctorin in 1vs1 against usa maybe good vs brits but its totally useless vs usa compared to the other doctorins and he had a very late reaction against your snipers after u had already destroyed his units with those 2 snipers he even tried to kill them with nebels!!!! , but great comeback though........


Literally everyone?

But yes, if he would have taken other doctrine, for example terror, he could bombard his base and win. I'm no pro too, i think he lost because he couldn't push into the base. If you can't do that, you can often lose against a guy who never quits. It's often going only about endurance, and how badly you want to win.

I wubbed, because i like smoke usage, it is underrated ability, which wins games and often makes them totaly different and good looking.

I wonder why no one uses it against sniper spam in 2 vs 2? It really helps.
#6ahmed gmy  Jun 27 2017, 23:15 PM -
Replays: 13
QUOTE(DesertDust @ Today, 18:17 PM)


Literally everyone?

But yes, if he would have taken other doctrine, for example terror, he could bombard his base and win. I'm no pro too, i think he lost because he couldn't push into the base. If you can't do that, you can often lose against a guy who never quits. It's often going only about endurance, and how badly you want to win.

I wubbed, because i like smoke usage, it is underrated ability, which wins games and often makes them totaly different and good looking.

I wonder why no one uses it against sniper spam in 2 vs 2? It really helps.

if i was happy in that game i would choose blitz and get stormtroops or stuh to destroy his base and finish the game very easily, or choose terror and try to protect the vp points, but definitely not defencive doctorin and about smoke yes its really really really underrated and not used a lot, even in brits that grenades rifle which u equip the brits inf squad with,it has the ability to fire smoke but still never seen any brits players use it , although wer always use mg and sniper spam vs brits
This post has been edited by ahmed gmy: Jun 27 2017, 23:18 PM
#7B_Sky_IIRevolutionII  Jun 28 2017, 00:07 AM -
Replays: 143
Awards:
QUOTE(ahmed gmy @ Today, 23:15 PM)

if i was happy in that game i would choose blitz and get stormtroops or stuh to destroy his base and finish the game very easily, or choose terror and try to protect the vp points, but definitely not defencive doctorin and about smoke yes its really really really underrated and not used a lot, even in brits that grenades rifle which u equip the brits inf squad with,it has the ability to fire smoke but still never seen any brits players use it , although wer always use mg and sniper spam vs brits

After that you do not predict it, because it took early defense doctrine, to counter a spam riffle spam, so that allowed me to evaluate to go wsc or t3 or even t4. Usually when you use a doctrine you have a fairly accurate way of playing (usually) and this time it took defense doctrine ...
#8LeonOfich  Jun 28 2017, 22:57 PM -
Replays: 56
QUOTE(ahmed gmy @ Today, 00:15 AM)

if i was happy in that game i would choose blitz and get stormtroops or stuh to destroy his base and finish the game very easily, or choose terror and try to protect the vp points, but definitely not defencive doctorin and about smoke yes its really really really underrated and not used a lot, even in brits that grenades rifle which u equip the brits inf squad with,it has the ability to fire smoke but still never seen any brits players use it , although wer always use mg and sniper spam vs brits


The entire base pin was centered around a defense doctrine. To be able to reinforce his MG's and volks through the hedge with his medic bunker. This base pin would've never succeeded with a blitz doctrine so your argument is irrelevant.
#9Argentinosaurus  Jun 29 2017, 00:06 AM -
Replays: 48
Awards:
QUOTE(LeonOfich @ Yesterday, 22:57 PM)


The entire base pin was centered around a defense doctrine. To be able to reinforce his MG's and volks through the hedge with his medic bunker. This base pin would've never succeeded with a blitz doctrine so your argument is irrelevant.


totally agree
#10ahmed gmy  Jun 29 2017, 13:59 PM -
Replays: 13
QUOTE(LeonOfich @ Yesterday, 22:57 PM)


The entire base pin was centered around a defense doctrine. To be able to reinforce his MG's and volks through the hedge with his medic bunker. This base pin would've never succeeded with a blitz doctrine so your argument is irrelevant.

no man he couldnt hold the medic bunker cause he was fucked by one mortar so the defencive doctorin was totally useless and that is just one mistake he didnt get any kind of antitanks till he saw the pershing it was too late
Reply to Comment