Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

Intense game vs NetT4

#1Kaos  Jun 12 2020, 16:36 PM -
Replays: 154 Game:
Awards:
gg
#2pwnstick  Jun 15 2020, 06:28 AM -
Replays: 76
Awards:
GG.

Question, WER never built more than T2 in this game, and USA never built T4.

WER had 2 paks + shrek

USA had 1 AT Gun + stickies

I think if it were me i would have built TD for at least an m10 or two to counter the Stuh. How do you determine in a game like this to go with only infantry all game? Is it a matter of constantly doing enough manpower damage that you know they can't afford to tech? You are comfortable countering a p4 or ostwind with just an AT gun + stickies?
#3B_Sky_IIRevolutionII  Jun 15 2020, 18:50 PM -
Replays: 215 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(pwnstick @ Today, 06:28 AM)
GG.

Question, WER never built more than T2 in this game, and USA never built T4.

WER had 2 paks + shrek

USA had 1 AT Gun + stickies

I think if it were me i would have built TD for at least an m10 or two to counter the Stuh. How do you determine in a game like this to go with only infantry all game? Is it a matter of constantly doing enough manpower damage that you know they can't afford to tech? You are comfortable countering a p4 or ostwind with just an AT gun + stickies?

the best is to always do a T4 after the T3 to compensate for the lack of armor among the Americans fairly quickly. It is dangerous to stay too long without a tank, especially if the WEHR makes several.
#4Kaos  Jun 15 2020, 20:03 PM -
Replays: 154 Game:
Awards:
I always feel comfortable playing without usa t4 when wehr doesn't have t4...and I also think at guns are a far better unit to counter armor than any usa tank, an I also feel that the m8 fills the sherman role pretty good, so unless I'm ahead, I'll always invest in supp yard upgrades/sniper/howitzer/rifle upgrades first...but that is just how I play usa
Reply to Comment