Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

[Week 2] Seb vs Wu #5

Langres (2)
Langres (2)
Game 1 of 5
12
1026
Game 2 of 5
16
1174
Game 3 of 5
11
1498
Game 4 of 5
23
1125
Game 5 of 5
currently viewing...
#1Seb  Dec 4 2011, 20:00 PM -
IPB Image



http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index...=0#entry8902917
This post has been edited by c0mpl3x1ty: Dec 4 2011, 20:55 PM
#2gu)2u  Dec 4 2011, 22:48 PM -
LOL @ sebs picture.
This post has been edited by gu)2u: Dec 4 2011, 22:49 PM
#3Rémy  Dec 4 2011, 23:02 PM -
Surprised by the OF match up but whatever, it was a nice game afterall

Nice series guys btw, it was really fun.

GG to both of you.
#4AmiPolizeiFunk  Dec 4 2011, 23:53 PM -
Awards:
Nice 1 gu)2u biggrin.gif
#5Dwighty  Dec 5 2011, 11:02 AM -
Replays: 4 Game:
Yep.

GG
#6captaincantface  Dec 5 2011, 11:25 AM -
Replays: 0 Game:
Never thought i would say epic churchill! lol
#7AmiPolizeiFunk  Dec 5 2011, 14:12 PM -
Awards:
Were we right on the cast in guessing that Wu had choice and picked PE, and you replied by picking Brits? Is this something we need to look into as far as faction picking goes? Should the VP leader have 2 options??

1) pick a faction

or

2) reserve the right to pick 2nd after the opponent has picked

From what I've seen in these first two SNFs, I can't BELIEVE how good the balance is right now. We've seen Wehr win Semois twice. We've seen Amis win Semois twice. We've seen Axis kicking ass on Ango (I swear that was an Amis map just 2 months ago). We've seen both VP leaders lose on Langres after picking their favorite faction. Madness! In a good way smile.gif
This post has been edited by AmiPolizeiFunk: Dec 5 2011, 14:14 PM
#8Seb  Dec 5 2011, 14:35 PM -
Yes that's right, he choosed PE and that's the only reason I took brit.


2) reserve the right to pick 2nd after the opponent has picked

If the VP loser can pick both his side and faction first, why not. But then I don't know if it would even be an advantage for the VP winner.

But if the VP winner can pick the side, and then even pick the faction after the other, that would give too much of an advantage and I think it's a really bad idea.



I actually don't know why you'd want to change it, both players have lost on G5 because they played badly their game. It is completely unrelated to the choice, Aimstrong WM last week was really poor on Langres, just as poor as it was on Ango the game before, while Siberian was clearly ready with US. And Wu hasn't been better yesterday. He almost had the game early on and teched completely wrong.
#9Kat  Dec 5 2011, 14:50 PM -
Replays: 14 Game:
QUOTE

2) reserve the right to pick 2nd after the opponent has picked
If the VP loser can pick both his side and faction first, why not. But then I don't know if it would even be an advantage for the VP winner.


So maybe VP loser may choose armies only from Axis/Allies side chosen by VP winner? Advantage of final faction choice is then on VP winner side (to counter his opponent faction choice), but most probably we won't have OF match - VP loser won't take brits (when he could choose from Allies) being scared of VP winner taking wehr as a response. And if VP loser would have a choice to take Axis then he would probably go wehr, cause if he take PE he wouldn't have such obvious advantage over his opponent who would probably choose brits as a counter (like Seb in this one), not "UP" US. This way we would have much desired vanilla Grand Finale match smile.gif
This post has been edited by Kat: Dec 5 2011, 14:55 PM
#10Ezio Auditore  Dec 5 2011, 20:45 PM -
QUOTE
LOL @ sebs picture.


Not even close ^^
Reply to Comment