Late game was so disgustingly OP imo. I wonder what US upkeep and pop was, hurts to even think about it. What should've US done differently?
Instead of going LHS armour for Pershing, I should have gone for double sniper after the Sherman to farm XP and go for Calliope. That way, I could break the PaK wall and drain his manpower. Pershing first left me with no population/manpower for snipers, and no way of advancing.
Lol how does one double post with 40m between the posts?
I was worried you lost your marbles after this game but I didn't think it was this bad. Writing a post and then 40m later writing the exact same post. That's some hardcore PTSD and brain meltdown right there (not that we blame you, especially after that attack ground bs).
But ok I see you are doing better now. Even came up with the "double post" excuse. This goes to show how powerful Canadian maple syrup magic really is. In Canada they don't have doctors, they have maple syrup wizards who just infuse you with "The Power of The Maple" to heal you.
But yeah, nice games. I like how you took turns making the other side look like a complete beginner at times. Revo getting omega flanked on sturz and then nosliw getting m8 to the base was very funny.
I'll start with the words of the tiger - a tank battle is not boxing for you)). Strange comments, I'll explain why. Tanks in the game 3-3 - The weakest tanks, tigers, royal tigers, pershing, for the offensive, 1,2,3, the tank, do not solve anything, only distract, shoot one calliope from afar, it makes no sense. Tanks in the 1-1 game, the stronger the tank, the larger the tank, the more it can decide, in the 1-1 game it is ineffective for the USA to use tanks, the Germans are always stronger head-on, since as a rule it is not profitable to fight them head-on , I always try to avoid this, the calliope appeared at the end, it is no longer needed, the game is over, it takes a long time. This is a beautiful fight between two professionals.
