Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

how to beat china pe

#11bulatcr  Apr 28 2017, 07:50 AM -
Replays: 30 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(abadas @ Today, 07:43 AM)
Nobody likes china biggrin.gif

it's not about hating or loving him, it's about trying to win his PE in 1v1
#12comander  Apr 28 2017, 08:59 AM -
Replays: 5
gg , well
#13genle  Apr 29 2017, 12:35 PM -
Replays: 18
I lost my first 10 games vs him but now I know what is the best way to beat him. My strat vs him works pretty good. I beat him on Ango and Langres!
M8 and Aimstrong wont work vs this PE-strat.

The key point vs him is munitions!!!! He always has same Caporder and donīt try to play something else.

I start with 3es. You need at least 1 Flamer. I play 4Rifles vs him.Its important to get some map with focus on munitions. Dont try to fight his Inf HT!!!! Direct retreat. Split up your units and try to cap him away the map until you have enough fuel to built a heelstation. Now you have to blob your units.
Play Bars! When you have the fuel add stickies!!!!

The next step is really important! Fight his InfHT Blob and make as much damage as you can. He donīt expect Barpop. When you time it correctly he usally lose 1-2 HTs.

But this doesnt matter! The point is tht he has to drive in his base to repair his HTīs. This takes him time because he doesnt have much Infantrie.

Now its your turn to steel him the whole Map!

You HAVE! to go Airbone. AirboneRanger are the HARDCOUNTER vs his HTs. He usally try to rebuilt them.
Play SuplyUpgrades now. You need Menpower! Play a second AB-Ranger. He will start building ACīs and Hetzers.
You can make a lot of pressure now. Drop 2-3 Paks. Idontunderstandenglish will try to decrew these and put all of his vehicles and Stg44 behind them. You have!!!! to build some very defensive mines behind your PAKs. Your AB-Ranger are not going to hit the ACīs. Barrifles with stickys next to your PAK beat the ACīs.

THATS IT!
#14bulatcr  Apr 29 2017, 16:49 PM -
Replays: 30 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(genle @ Today, 12:35 PM)
I lost my first 10 games vs him but now I know what is the best way to beat him. My strat vs him works pretty good. I beat him on Ango and Langres!
M8 and Aimstrong wont work vs this PE-strat.

The key point vs him is munitions!!!! He always has same Caporder and donīt try to play something else.

I start with 3es. You need at least 1 Flamer. I play 4Rifles vs him.Its important to get some map with focus on munitions. Dont try to fight his Inf HT!!!! Direct retreat. Split up your units and try to cap him away the map until you have enough fuel to built a heelstation. Now you have to blob your units.
Play Bars! When you have the fuel add stickies!!!!

The next step is really important! Fight his InfHT Blob and make as much damage as you can. He donīt expect Barpop. When you time it correctly he usally lose 1-2 HTs.

But this doesnt matter! The point is tht he has to drive in his base to repair his HTīs. This takes him time because he doesnt have much Infantrie.

Now its your turn to steel him the whole Map!

You HAVE! to go Airbone. AirboneRanger are the HARDCOUNTER vs his HTs. He usally try to rebuilt them.
Play SuplyUpgrades now. You need Menpower! Play a second AB-Ranger. He will start building ACīs and Hetzers.
You can make a lot of pressure now. Drop 2-3 Paks. Idontunderstandenglish will try to decrew these and put all of his vehicles and Stg44 behind them. You have!!!! to build some very defensive mines behind your PAKs. Your AB-Ranger are not going to hit the ACīs. Barrifles with stickys next to your PAK beat the ACīs.

THATS IT!


spliting units and capping around the map is actually a thing vs his strat i noticed that too
#15GerladineCOH  May 10 2017, 15:06 PM -
Replays: 6
shamefull this sniper noob got Replay of the week
#16Kodachrome  May 31 2017, 18:44 PM -
Awards:
Is this racisim on the front page of Gamereplays.org? Gentlemen, please, reconsider.
#17Kodachrome  Jul 24 2017, 17:57 PM -
Awards:
QUOTE(abadas @ Apr 28 2017, 02:43 AM)
Nobody likes china biggrin.gif

The Executive Authority of the United States of America loves China.
Reply to Comment