I know my execution was not perfect this game, but that is still sort of the point of why I uploaded it (it shows that better execution would have been a steamroll).
Despite some clear mistakes, the ending move was a clear counter to your strategy (a very common style) and I wanted to show the naysayers that this is a completely valid way to play.
And I have heard lots of players complain about dog spams as soviets on ii, with the usual response being a bear spam of their own, which is risky and unnecessarily expensive to simply secure an oil derrick. This method is much more solid and I hope soviet players learn from it.
I know my execution was not perfect this game, but that is still sort of the point of why I uploaded it (it shows that better execution would have been a steamroll).
Despite some clear mistakes, the ending move was a clear counter to your strategy (a very common style) and I wanted to show the naysayers that this is a completely valid way to play.
And I have heard lots of players complain about dog spams as soviets on ii, with the usual response being a bear spam of their own, which is risky and unnecessarily expensive to simply secure an oil derrick. This method is much more solid and I hope soviet players learn from it.
vs dogs not bad idea,but anyway u win only when im mistake,easy to counter it ^^
I know my execution was not perfect this game, but that is still sort of the point of why I uploaded it (it shows that better execution would have been a steamroll).
Despite some clear mistakes, the ending move was a clear counter to your strategy (a very common style) and I wanted to show the naysayers that this is a completely valid way to play.
And I have heard lots of players complain about dog spams as soviets on ii, with the usual response being a bear spam of their own, which is risky and unnecessarily expensive to simply secure an oil derrick. This method is much more solid and I hope soviet players learn from it.
vs dogs not bad idea,but anyway u win only when im mistake,easy to counter it ^^
I expected a response from some people like this - the "naysayers". But ignore it if you like, it will mean more wins for me and other soviets that have taken note
Brag game. Andrey was behind when he put that AF down.
GBH won when he blindly built Bullfogs.
The win wasn't why I uploaded it, as I think I have explained in my comments. I uploaded it because of the styles that I used, where I played badly and it still worked quite comfortably, showing it is a perfectly viable way to play.
I admit the frogs were blind but I based it off what he almost always does. But something to take from that is to simply send the starting bears for water scouts after he bunker completes.
The win wasn't why I uploaded it, as I think I have explained in my comments. I uploaded it because of the styles that I used, where I played badly and it still worked quite comfortably, showing it is a perfectly viable way to play.
I admit the frogs were blind but I based it off what he almost always does. But something to take from that is to simply send the starting bears for water scouts after he bunker completes.[/quote]
I thought the bunker was interesting but that's all. Everything else was pretty standard. I see an MCV push with Hammers against Reptides and MGTs. That's not special, not new and not exciting. I think people would appreciate a 'new style' if you use it against other players, too. Also, use it in close games. The only time you were in a disadvantage was when you built your bunker. That period was over when said bunker was finished.
(Ignore my rax fail at the end... It was my first game of the day so my awareness wasn't properly on par)
Enjoy