muahahahaha this guy finally beat me after million losses and bcz of his shitty on host, its just too pathetic when they refuse to wait for a neutral host.
Luke is great example for this behaviour, i asked him to find a neutral then he waited for like 30s and said he cant find anyone. he wanted at least one free win against me bcz he knows i would rape him 2-0 on neutral hosts so i was too generous and i gave him 2 free wins by quitting the tournament.
btw thanks mako for your retard decision about my ban, i wouldnt want to participate in any of ur future tournaments anyways where players dnt play all their matches on neutral, might as well just make it only one match per round on neutral, just watch the on/off hosts duels and u can clearly see that more than 80% the on host win (unless the off host guy is way better than the on host)
muahahahaha this guy finally beat me after million losses and bcz of his shitty on host, its just too pathetic when they refuse to wait for a neutral host.
Luke is great example for this behaviour, i asked him to find a neutral then he waited for like 30s and said he cant find anyone. he wanted at least one free win against me bcz he knows i would rape him 2-0 on neutral hosts so i was too generous and i gave him 2 free wins by quitting the tournament.
btw thanks mako for your retard decision about my ban, i wouldnt want to participate in any of ur future tournaments anyways where players dnt play all their matches on neutral, might as well just make it only one match per round on neutral, just watch the on/off hosts duels and u can clearly see that more than 80% the on host win (unless the off host guy is way better than the on host)
I never seen dread writing that much, he must have impacted in u deeply
This post has been edited by May-ShadowFax: Dec 2 2017, 09:55 AM
muahahahaha this guy finally beat me after million losses and bcz of his shitty on host, its just too pathetic when they refuse to wait for a neutral host.
Luke is great example for this behaviour, i asked him to find a neutral then he waited for like 30s and said he cant find anyone. he wanted at least one free win against me bcz he knows i would rape him 2-0 on neutral hosts so i was too generous and i gave him 2 free wins by quitting the tournament.
btw thanks mako for your retard decision about my ban, i wouldnt want to participate in any of ur future tournaments anyways where players dnt play all their matches on neutral, might as well just make it only one match per round on neutral, just watch the on/off hosts duels and u can clearly see that more than 80% the on host win (unless the off host guy is way better than the on host)
Dread don't forget you're changing how the game works when you demand neutral host for all games.
It's well known you don't use trampling cav units. But we can't ignore that other players do. By denying people their onhost match, you deny them proper control. Which obviously benefits your play style.
Dread don't forget you're changing how the game works when you demand neutral host for all games.
It's well known you don't use trampling cav units. But we can't ignore that other players do. By denying people their onhost match, you deny them proper control. Which obviously benefits your play style.
you want each player to experience a free extra control advantage which highly increase winning percentage, its funny how u worry about the trample control advantage and totally ignore statistics about onhost wins.
now this is what i call ignorance
everyone knows that neutral host is a fair choice thats why u want the third game to be like that.
dreadreapr angmar