Explore GameReplays...

Rise of the Witch King

XsA(Goblins/Angmar)vs.JR(MotW/Mordor)

#51StormRage`  Jul 10 2008, 19:15 PM -
Replays: 3 Game:
Awards:
well i checked it up,cuz i was 100% sure that i build at 97%,I do that since 2 years,so I had to see who was right!^^
Try to get one of your starting RB’s at 97% or better. (Men)
Try to get one of your starting RB’s at 97% or better. (Angmar)

The only mistake that you made, was that you didn’t have any of your PB’s at 97%. In the long run, that really hurts your game, and if this game didn’t go into the long run, no game did.
Thats wrong i checked it up,all build first 3 RBs at 97% or more!
I have SS but idk how to post them! biggrin.gif
#52Sir Snoopy  Jul 10 2008, 23:32 PM -
Replays: 10 Game:
Awards:
I'd rather not be bothered to do it, but I am positive.
Either way, I won't edit the review, because it's over, and that idea is so structured in, it doesn't matter.
This post has been edited by Sir Snoopy: Jul 10 2008, 23:33 PM
#53Ivan  Jul 25 2008, 12:48 PM -
Replays: 13 Game:
QUOTE
Very good review but u made a few minor mistakes. Stormrage is right even if he used rebuild it would only of delayed us killing his fort for about 20 seconds lol i had belrog with still tons of life, azog with carnage killing it, gobking attacking it, and 25 pp dragon waiting and as stormrage said he had giants.

hmm. Barlong can't hurt very much upgraded fortress. Neighter dragon summon. Azog's rage was almost gone. Odyssey had 2k for towers eventually. Gobking would be killed by fortress anyhow, he isn't that good against fortress. Also giants wouldn't hurt much, as rohhirims could kill them anyhow.
Snoopy is very pro for reviews, he can maybe overlook sometimes for some things like PB's, but usually everything he says - is right for sure, so there is no need for testing his review for mistakes, lol. Just say "thanks" next time. wink.gif
#54Danny^  Jul 27 2008, 04:25 AM -
Replays: 1 Game:
Awards:
If u actually read before making remarks SNWrist we said thank you and said it was a very good review, plus the fort was going down either way rebuild or not if u think not watch the rep again.
#55Sir Snoopy  Jul 29 2008, 23:00 PM -
Replays: 10 Game:
Awards:
I'll pass on watching the rep again. tongue.gif
#56StormRage`  Aug 12 2008, 00:43 AM -
Replays: 3 Game:
Awards:
Just wanted to corrcet u in ur review,so u will maybe watch closer next time,nobody is perfect.
But without critizism nothing improves,it was just a hint SNWrist,ofc a review cant be changed,and I never said it was a bad one,just pointed out the mistakes he made,like he pointed out the mistakes we did ingame.
There has to be the possibility to criticize reviewers for mistakes,otherwise reviewing and the feature of rating the review would be pointless,wouldnt it?
#57Ivan  Aug 12 2008, 12:30 PM -
Replays: 13 Game:

Yes, you're right. But I think that everyone should be more positive, because to make reviews like this one it can take a really long-long time, so it's like a gift for a reviewer if you say that he made a great review. Ofcourse it's our responsability to take care of opinion of players for which the review was made for. Yeh, I understand very well and appreciate your point of view. I just wanted to say some words about Snoopy. tongue.gif
And please always post comments about review. smile.gif
Reply to Comment