They're still weak compared to Zerg after 7 patches.
And sure MMM+tanks own any zerg ground forces but the economical cost on the Terran is like 3x higher to mass that kinda stuff and Zerg have superior economy/unit production anyway.
This post has been edited by Blinky: Apr 2 2010, 10:44 AM
WoW this replay show realy how weak is Terran Atm, Muslim did a great job, maybe some little fails at the start (helions to late) but diehilde make some fails too but muslim can do nothing diehilde run in his base without micoing and muslim micro very well and defence very well but..... imba.
Zerg lost 10k more in units and still easily dominated end game, even though Terran did a lot of mirco and had really quite a good army composition (and even had a Planetary Fortress killing off forty-something Zerg).
With this in mind, the match should not have been this one-sided in the end. Sure, Zerg gets economic advantage, especially when being left alone, but that was too much of a wash.
It was economy that won the day, just look at the resourcing difference. At one point Z player had over 2000+ in minerals at his disposal while T player had about 115, give or take. T player certainly had better micro, no doubt, but even the best micro means nothing if you don't have any units to use it with!
Wubbed.
You obviously don't know how to play since you seem to still think that terrans are weak after 7 patches.
MMM+tanks > ANY zerg ground forces
Also what micro is he talking about? The only "micro" i saw was marauders getting ultras, which ANY MORON could do.
GG by zerg.