Explore GameReplays...

Supreme Commander

[-] TNT vs PecosBill [3223]

#1TNT  Apr 4 2007, 22:30 PM -
Replays: 16 Game:
This was a pretty fun game. I decided I was going to go heavy mantis spam early on, and built plenty of engineers so I could identify his strat and target the weakness. He did the typical t1 spam to harbs, but had very little AA/interceptors, so I decided to up the anty by superspamming mantis as a distraction while i built up to take advantage of his weakness (also I already had t3 and was about to start counterspamming siege bots). I won't spoil the ending, but if he had been more careful i'd have lost. You couldn't tell who was going to win until the end!


Please review!
#2LeVirus Watts  Apr 5 2007, 22:23 PM -
Replays: 0 Game:
That was quite the abrupt ending. I haven't played on GPG yet, so I don't believe a review from me would be very good.

It seemed odd to me that they didn't go beyond tech two during the match. Guess I'm going to have to get owned a couple of times before I relise not all games are technology races.

<edit>
*snif* I just tried to zoom out on the forum...
</edit>
This post has been edited by LeVirus Watts: Apr 5 2007, 22:24 PM
#3TNT  Apr 6 2007, 07:42 AM -
Replays: 16 Game:
QUOTE(LeVirus Watts @ Apr 5 2007, 12:23 PM) *
That was quite the abrupt ending. I haven't played on GPG yet, so I don't believe a review from me would be very good.

It seemed odd to me that they didn't go beyond tech two during the match. Guess I'm going to have to get owned a couple of times before I relise not all games are technology races.

<edit>
*snif* I just tried to zoom out on the forum...
</edit>


Look a bit closer, we got to t3 wink.gif
#4TNT  Apr 8 2007, 07:13 AM -
Replays: 16 Game:
bump

review please
#5Mister T  Apr 8 2007, 08:54 AM -
Replays: 0 Game:
who need renegade now ? wink.gif
#6TNT  Apr 8 2007, 18:16 PM -
Replays: 16 Game:
QUOTE(Mister T @ Apr 7 2007, 22:54 PM) *
who need renegade now ? wink.gif



well, renegades require less micro and are more reliable against units. t1 gunships are good for killing comms tho.
#7Jean=A=Luc  Apr 9 2007, 14:24 PM -
Replays: 4 Game:
I was just wondering, since you used Dragonflies, weren't those technically t2 gunships, or some kind of a t1/t2 gunship combo? Not really important I guess but it might be a nice thing to argue/flame each other over. tongue.gif Gj anyway, poor ACUs, so weak and vulnerable but if you buff them they become op early game. Maybe make the shield/cloak upgrades drastically cheaper or allow them later on to deploy/integrate into some kind of a command center with a lot of hp/shield/whateva'...
#8TNT  Apr 9 2007, 17:55 PM -
Replays: 16 Game:
QUOTE(Jean=A=Luc @ Apr 9 2007, 04:24 AM) *
I was just wondering, since you used Dragonflies, weren't those technically t2 gunships, or some kind of a t1/t2 gunship combo? Not really important I guess but it might be a nice thing to argue/flame each other over. tongue.gif Gj anyway, poor ACUs, so weak and vulnerable but if you buff them they become op early game. Maybe make the shield/cloak upgrades drastically cheaper or allow them later on to deploy/integrate into some kind of a command center with a lot of hp/shield/whateva'...


I agree... They need a nerf early game and a boost late game- they get raped by strat bombers and gunships especially.


As for the dragonflies, yeah, i forgot about that. I just call them "ghetto gunships" anyway! biggrin.gif
#9TNT  Apr 13 2007, 02:14 AM -
Replays: 16 Game:
Sigh. I'll bump this as many times as it takes. smilie_bleh.gif


REVIEW PLEASE
#10_PINK  Apr 13 2007, 03:03 AM -
Replays: 9 Game:
Aaand the reasoning behind Dragonfly gunships is...? =o
Reply to Comment