Please vote on whether you feel this replay deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. This poll will close on Apr 13 2010, 17:21 PM.
If you want to vote on this replay's promotion to the Hall of Fame, there are things you can look out for that make this replay stand out from other replays. This will ensure that the replay truly deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.
In a short summary, here is what makes a replay worthy of being in the Hall of Fame:
Neither of the players made any major mistakes, only minor mistakes made the difference
The replay shows a rarely seen strategy, which somehow was pulled off despite the opponent's best attempts to counter it
The replay is unusually entertaining, making this replay one of a kind
For my taste it was slightly to predictable that Squaak is going to win. But that doesnt change the fact that this game was great... so i vote for yes
Yeah, I thought it was OVER early game, squaak hadn't lost much, and was doing really well. But ugly Mart was constantly attacking. I thought there were times when ugly was gonna come out on top.
Killing usa supplies is just usefull if they have no power, else you will give them tons of chinooks
So...scared he gonna drop ? Lol.
QUOTE(rarely @ Apr 7 2010, 14:21 PM)
whats the point of killing an usa supp ?
Eco slowing down, need invest 2000 for another supp. Can't remeber where his reactor was placed, but when close kill it too. No reactor is 50% buildspeed for units.
This post has been edited by Blue_Fox: Apr 7 2010, 14:26 PM
if he has s&d i can say gg wp a supply depot can handle like 4 chinooks he only gets more chinooks which forces him to go middle if hes smart and then ur out camped usa has too much money and gg wp
This post has been edited by rarely: Apr 7 2010, 14:41 PM
You're not slowing down USA's eco when he has more nooks to collect money. It's the biggest waste of time and money to destroy USA supplies. The strat centre is the most important thing to destroy so your argument should be pro and not contra.
Please vote on whether you feel this replay deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.
This poll will close on Apr 13 2010, 17:21 PM.
If you want to vote on this replay's promotion to the Hall of Fame, there are things you can look out for that make this replay stand out from other replays.
This will ensure that the replay truly deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.
In a short summary, here is what makes a replay worthy of being in the Hall of Fame:
- Neither of the players made any major mistakes, only minor mistakes made the difference
- The replay shows a rarely seen strategy, which somehow was pulled off despite the opponent's best attempts to counter it
- The replay is unusually entertaining, making this replay one of a kind
A more detailed explanation of the Hall of Fame.Posts: 9,259