If everybody rates a game 5/10, 6/10, 7/10 or 8/10 and you rate it 3/10, something went wrong. Well, I actually don't mind if you vote 3/10 if you post an explanation.
You simply did it to piss Trixx off.. that's what I call "power abuse".
Guys, calm down now. Basel wanted to annoy me for fun. I know it sucks and I was mad myself, but I dont want that it ends in a War like this now. Just leave the game like it is now, please
its not abuse its like other games like that rating whit trojan when he gives a micro 3 and give it a silver replay isnt that shiittt if i voted there rank 1 then that is my opppinnionn understandd thatt and now u goeing into what i think*!!!!! and what my oppinion and u warn me that is unacceptable !
This post has been edited by Basel: Feb 9 2007, 18:26 PM
If everybody rates a game 5/10, 6/10, 7/10 or 8/10 and you rate it 3/10, something went wrong. Well, I actually don't mind if you vote 3/10 if you post an explanation.
This is actually 100% correct. Basel, please use common sense when rating a replay. The highest rating here is 8, the lowest 6. Giving a 1 or a 3 is obviously no accurate rating here . At least not without explanation. Abuse of the rating system is against the forum rules:
Category II violations First occurrence of abusing the ability to vote for the rating of a replay or failing to use common sense when rating a replay.
Category III violations Subsequent occurrence of abusing the ability to vote for the rating of a replay or failing to use common sense when rating a replay.
Cypher could have handed out two warnings, yet he only warned you once. Please use common sense when rating a replay. This game is obviously a 6-8 so rate it 5 if you do not like it but not 1 or 3 3 means the replay is shit. Both player didn't know what to do. I'd propably deserve a 3 for a CCG game but not this two guys . Again: Please use common sense when rating a replay.
.
You simply did it to piss Trixx off.. that's what I call "power abuse".