this topic have to stay open, rans is honorable member, he posted a rep asking for review. dunno who closed but it s not needed
yes its nothing to do with rans but obviously rans was not in this replay. both who were playing in this replay were banned members?and i bet trojan asked rans to post it.tell me if im wrong.
means nothing to bann people if they can keep "posting" their replays, although not directly by them. its like they can use other`s account after their own account be banned?
forsure its ok if the game was played by "rans vs trojan" or "rans vs hemp". but this one is "trojan vs hemp"
sometimes we need to think about why the rules are made.then follow the rules. not just follow the rules without thinking what are the reasons rules are made.
in this case...under GR rules,convicted twice means banned.NO LONGER CAN POST/USE GR. but here u can see trojan is still using this site,although not directly by him which means...u guys been fooled by kid like him
and guess what...if there is no other "good game" for this week,will this replay,played by 2 banned users will be taken as RoTW contender? what ever...so many craps happened in CCG section recently.good luck!
This post has been edited by ifan9701: Jul 6 2007, 22:08 PM
yes its nothing to do with rans but obviously rans was not in this replay. both who were playing this game were banned members?and i bet trojan asked rans to post it.tell me if im wrong.
means nothing to bann people if they can keep "posting" their replays. although not directly by them.
u have a good point, yet i think closing topic need a reason, and closing this isn t needed, there is no flam at all here. Maybe no review but no closing
150 k is decent rep usually for uvu, it is allowed to get reviewed if someone wish to do. + closing topic which don t deserve it is senceless.
This post has been edited by -LuCiFeR-: Jul 6 2007, 21:49 PM
150 k is decent rep usually for uvu, it is allowed to get reviewed if someone wish to do. + closing topic which don t deserve it is senceless.
so u gonna review the replay played by banned users? maybe put their replay into RoTW contenders? i wanna make a suggestion...unbanned them all. its meaningless
so u gonna review the replay played by banned users? maybe put their replay into RoTW contenders? i wanna make a suggestion...unbanned them all. its meaningless
and what make this topic a topic of the 1V1 section wich have to be closed ? closing is moderating, what does here need to get moderate? i don t see any problems here me even i don t like guys or w.e....
and what make this topic a topic of the 1V1 section wich have to be closed ?
tell u what...this site is for users to post their good games/asking help etc. but defenitely not for the users that been banned.they got their chances twice but they ruined them. by letting banned members posting replays(although not directly by them) is like giving infinite chances to them. come on...u still couldnt get the idea?
what ever...at least i know i never been fooled by kid like trojan
This post has been edited by ifan9701: Jul 6 2007, 23:01 PM