Explore GameReplays...

CNC Zero Hour

11/07/2005 vGLA mirror

#21WiSeSoUl^  Jul 16 2005, 16:19 PM -
Replays: 35 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(Bahamut @ Jul 16 2005, 04:38 PM)
francais plays gla for over 7 monyths tbh
*



True, have been playing it some time, but lately i merely played random (everyone dodges gla :| =\ (including u btw)), and glav mirs have been a LONG time gone. (Edit: btw, havent even been playing ZHOL actively for 6 months, so let alone playing gla for 7 =\)

Also @ Eficko; sry, i guess i misunderstood ur first story, thought you were talking about it in general. It's true, my buggy micro wasn't at its best, neither was my overall play in this game, i mean; never should've lost my supply at first hand;)

Anyway, i guess 8/10 is too high, still doesnt make it a less interesting game imo. smile.gif


Edit2: ffs annoying little brother with his fucking account. Anyway, this is KOELIEOH on wrong account wink.gif
This post has been edited by WiSeSoUl^: Jul 16 2005, 16:22 PM
#22StriFe  Jul 16 2005, 17:42 PM -
Replays: 0 Game:
iI’m disappointed Eficko, I really wanted to educate ur arrogant ass, but I guess the logic in my statements elude u. please read it again… many times if u have to…. Until u finally grasp it.
#23RagaRock  Jul 16 2005, 20:36 PM -
Replays: 4
No need for name-calling here, discuss the replay not eachother.

I gave the replay 7.5 in the original topic, I voted 8 after I made the topic here, hoping that a few of the senior soldiers would vote 7 or lower so the score got closer to the reviews. So forget the score and check out the original topic for reviews.

I liked the game, the micro/macro was kind of dodgy at times, but it was close and I found it very enertaining. Last week wasn't the best in terms of replays either, just two was up for voting and this replay got all the votes. So a well deserved win imo.

Anyone has the right to critizise the replay, the review or the fact that it got ROTW without posting a better game themself, just keep it constructive. And there is no need to get personal if someone didn't like the game.
#24Eficko  Jul 16 2005, 21:11 PM -
Replays: 4 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE(RagaRock @ Jul 16 2005, 09:36 PM)
No need for name-calling here, discuss the replay not eachother.

I gave the replay 7.5 in the original topic, I voted 8 after I made the topic here, hoping that a few of the senior soldiers would vote 7 or lower so the score got closer to the reviews. So forget the score and check out the original topic for reviews.

I liked the game, the micro/macro was kind of dodgy at times, but it was close and I found it very enertaining. Last week wasn't the best in terms of replays either, just two was up for voting and this replay got all the votes. So a well deserved win imo.

Anyone has the right to critizise the replay, the review or the fact that it got ROTW without posting a better game themself, just keep it constructive. And there is no need to get personal if someone didn't like the game.
*




well said!!

i apoligise for anything bad i said in this topic, i just got annoyed because i gave my review of the game and i got critised for it.

Eficko
Reply to Comment